Rakocy, Waldemar2024-10-102024-10-102012The Biblical Annals, 2012, T. 2, nr 1, s. 195-216.2083-22222451-2168https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/21597In reply to Ed P. Sanders’s thesis we state that Romans 2 does not show inconsistencies within itself, neither with the immediate context, nor with other places in the Epistle. We prove it mainly by analyzing formal subjects in the text. Inconsistencies in Romans 2 were the main reason leading Sanders to the conclusion that chapter 2 derives from the homiletical material of Diaspora Judaism (a synagogue sermon). We don’t rule out this possibility altogether but we point out that his arguments supporting the hypothesis are not sufficient and require additional proofs.plCC-BY - Uznanie autorstwaLetter to the Romansuniversal sinfulnessjustification by faith in Christsinfulnesssinletters of Saint PaulBibleNew Testamentfaithjustificationinconsistency of Saint Paul's disquisitioninconsistency of the disquisition in Rom 2List do RzymianRz 2powszechna grzesznośćusprawiedliwienie z wiary w Chrystusagrzesznośćgrzechlisty św. PawłaBibliaPismo ŚwięteNowy TestamentwiarausprawiedliwienieEd Parish Sandersniespójność wywodu św. Pawłaniespójność wywodu w Rz 2Article