Stec, Tomasz2022-10-212022-10-212015Premislia Christiana, 2014-2015, T. 16, s. 327-342.0867-308http://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/1556Article aims to show the significant differences that exist between euthanasia and persistent treatment. It reminds once again the Catholic Church’s teaching regarding this issue. Presents documents that this problem moving. In the first parts the author presents life as sacred, as the highest value. Sequentially presented arguments are supporters of euthanasia and significant differences between euthanasia and persistent therapy. The last point is shown the moral evaluation of these acts. In this way, the reader will have no problem to clearly assess morally ever new dilemmas and attempt to falsify the difference in the end of human life. Adoption of such a topie is important because many countries in west Europe show euthanasia as a humane, good deeds and legalizes in the law. More and more people do not see this as a problem, the same desire to decide on the conception and range of life without reference to the Creator. Many people doctrine of the Church of presistent therapy is interpreted as permission to euthanasia. Therefore, it is important to show elear on their differences between the two actions.plAttribution 3.0 Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/teologia systematycznateologiaeutanazjażycieśmierćterapiaetykamoralnośćuporczywa terapiamedycynawartościKościółMagisterium Kościołasobór watykański IIsobórpapieżekapłaniduchowieństwodokumenty KościołaGaudium et spesencyklikaEvangelium vitaeJan Paweł IIKarol WojtyłaPaweł VIbiologiabioetykasystematic theologytheologyeuthanasialifedeaththerapyethicsmoralitymedicinevaluesChurchVatican IISecond Vatican CouncilcouncilpopesclergypriesthoodencyclicJohn Paul IIPaul VIbiologybioethicspersistent therapyeugenicsmoral evaluation of euthanasiaeugenikamoralna ocena eutanazjiArticle