Szram, Mariusz2023-04-192023-04-191997Roczniki Teologiczne, 1997, T. 44, z. 4, s. 5-16.0035-7723http://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/6393Autor tłumaczenia streszczenia: Jan Kłos.The paper shows the Stoic doctrine on the semantic and morphological origin of words with reference to the names of the Roman deities and their nicknames which accompanied those names. The basic source of this doctrine we find in paragraphs 45-80 of Book II and 38-65 o f Book III of Cicero’ s work De natura deorum. According to Stoics, the names of gods are connected with a concrete material reality, through which a deity acts (e.g. Diana - dies; Ceres - the Greek ge) or with abstract concepts, pointing to certain states and behaviours which a given deity introduces (e.g. Virtus, Concordia, Libertas). The nicknames define the role gods played towards man and the world, and express their specific characteristics. Both the names and nicknames are derived mainly form verbs and adjectives. Cicero, through the mouth of the academic Kotty, evaluates the Stoic etymologies with skepticism as lacking scientific approach and based on loose associations. They are, however, an important source of knowledge about the scope of influence different Roman gods imparted, and constitute one of the first documents about linguistic interests.plAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/stoicyzminterpretacjainterpretacja etymologicznaimionaprzydomkibóstwarzymscy bogowieCyceronstoicka interpretacja etymologicznaetymologia stoickaimiona bogów rzymskichprzydomki bogów rzymskichetymologie imion bogów rzymskichstoicisminterpretationetymological interpretationnamesepithetsgodsRoman godsCicerostoic etymological interpretationstoic etymologynames of Roman godsepithets of Roman godsetymologies of the names of Roman godsetymologiaetymologyArticle