Biesaga, Tadeusz2023-07-032023-07-032000Analecta Cracoviensia, 2000, T. 32, s. 89-100.0209-0864http://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/8835The article mentions the changes in the field of moral theology concerning the justification of the fundamentals of morality. It directs the discussion as a dispute between ethica of I. Kant and the ethica of St. Thomas, in particular as the dispute between two personalisms: personalism of K. Rahner and his disciples and the personalism of K. Wojtyla and his followers. The first is transcendental or idealistic personalism, the other is realistic personalism. The proposal of the fundamental option of person, namely: his/her project of oneself and social project, worked out in the new moral theology as the basis of morality, implies a dualistic, angelologie concept of man as freedom thrown into nature and in the field of ethics it reveals itself as hidden utilitarianism. The rejection of perceptive knowledge and receptive conscience in which the dignity of another person is revealed as a norm of morality leads to the destruction of personalism. Without revealing this dignity the other person as well as my own person will be unavoidably treated as a means of realizing my subjective selfproject as well as historical and social processes.plAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/Karl RahnerKarol Wojtyłateolodzyteologowieteologia moralnanowa teologia moralnapersonalizmkryzysprzemianaVeritatis splendorencyklikaKościółdokumenty Kościołagodnośćgodność osobygodność ludzkamoralnośćwybórwolnośćautonomiaautonomia teonomicznakryptoutylitaryzmetykapluralizm etycznyutylitaryzmtranscendencjatheologiansmoral theologynew moral theologypersonalismcrisistransformationencyclicChurchdignitydignity of a personhuman dignitymoralitychoicefreedomautonomytheonomic autonomycrypto-utilitarianismethicsethical pluralismutilitarianismtranscendencetheologyteologiaArticle