Żelazny, Jan2022-12-232022-12-232006Polonia Sacra, 2006, R. 10 (28), Nr 19 (63), s. 337-346.1428-5673http://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/2717We often come across different views on the gist of an argument between Hieronymus and Rufin in literature. Issues of ambitiousness, those relating to their character or, the assumption of two adverse standpoints on Orygenes' legacy by the two ex-friends are pointed out. In connection with this, in the whole conflict about accusations about the so called “orygenism”, various approaches to inspiration of Scripture and the role of Tradition in its interpretation are mentioned. All these remarks are true.plAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/Rufin z AkwileibiografiastarożytnośćteolodzyteologowieHieronim ze Strydonudoktorzy KościołasporytłumaczeniaprzekładyOrygenesRufinus of AquileiabiographyantiquitytheologiansJerome of StridondisputestranslationsOrigenpatrologypatrologiapatrystykapatristicsRufinowa koncepcja roli i zadań tłumaczaRufin's Conception of Role and Tasks of TranslatorArticle