Körner, Bernhard2025-09-252025-09-252018Teologia w Polsce, 2018, Tom 12, Nr 2, s. 35-48.2956-63551732-4572https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/36544With the end of neoscholastic theology, there was a necessity of new definition of relation between dogmatics, which is now understood from the perspective of history of salvation, and exegesis which, among other methods, uses a historicocritical method. Fundamentals of that new understanding have been given by the constitution Dei Verbum of Vaticanum II. Reffering to this document, the article presents the thesis that the interpretation of the Holy Scripture by the Church through the ages, that is in the living Tradition, and historicocritical interpretation are two different approaches which, nevertheless, should not be contradicted. What is more, we can read the Bible and understand it not just as a historical text but as the Word of God for today, only when we take into account the mutual influence of these two approaches.plCC-BY - Uznanie autorstwaobjawienieSłowo Bożekościelno-dogmatyczna wykładnia Pisma Świętegoegzegeza historyczno-krytycznahistorycznośćrola egzegezy w dogmatycedogmatykateologia dogmatycznateologiaegzegezametoda historyczno-krytycznaBibliaPismo ŚwięterevelationWord of Godecclesiastical-dogmatic explanation of the Scripturehistorical-critical exegesishistoricityrole of exegesis in dogmaticsdogmaticsdogmatic theologytheologyexegesishistorical-critical methodBibleJaką rolę odgrywa egzegeza w dogmatyce?How Exegesis Influences Dogmatics?Article