Zawadzki, Arnold2024-11-182024-11-182020The Biblical Annals, 2020, T. 10, nr 2, s. 303-326.2451-21682083-2222https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23770Recenzja publikacji w języku włoskim / Review: James M. Bos, Reconsidering the Date and the Provenance of the Book of Hosea. The  Case for the  Persian-Period Yehud (Library of  Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 580; London-New Delhi-New York-Sydney: Bloomsbury 2013). Pp. XII+196. $ 91 (HB), $31,46 (PB), $22,25 (eBook). ISBN 978-0-567-16418-6 (HB), 978-0-567-65717-6 (PB), 978-0-567-068897 (eBook).The article presents an extended review of James M. Bos’s book Reconsidering the Date and the Provenance of the Book of Hosea. The Case for the Persian-Period Yehud, against the backdrop of the issue of the new historicism in biblical studies. After a brief overview of the phenomenon of this new historicism (its genesis and historical development), Bos’s approach is discussed from the point of view of its ideological-philosophical context. Then a detailed analysis of the entire structure of Bos’s book is presented, along with a critical assessment of his reasoning. The author of the article argues that the new historicist approach is completely subjective and wrong, as it absolutizes a philosophical principle without admitting the element of faith or any possibility of coincidence or doubt.itCC-BY - Uznanie autorstwanew historicismnew historicism in biblical studiesHoseaBosPersian periodLiveranihistoricismBibleOld Testamentbiblical studiesnowy historyzmnowy historyzm w studiach biblijnychOzeaszokres perskihistoryzmBibliaPismo ŚwięteStary Testamentbiblistykaneostoricismoneostoricismo negli studi bibliciOseaperiodo persianoArticle