Szkutnik, Dariusz2025-09-102025-09-102017Resovia Sacra, 2017, Tom 24, s. 477-493.1234-8880https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/35723The article showed Hans Driesch’s (1867−1941) evidence in favour of his neo-vitalistic concept. Although the first „proof of vitalism’’ led him to valuable scientific dicoveries, focusing on identifying and defining the basic morphogenetic processes (totipotency, within the processes of regeneration, prospective power and prospective meaning), other „evidence” are the concepts, which do not offer any revealing cognitive content both in the area of genetics and within the movements of organic animals including humans. However, they have specifically methodological value that is worthy of attention within widely understood the philosophy of nature.plCC-BY-SA - Uznanie autorstwa - Na tych samych warunkachentelechiapsychoidsystem harmonijno-ekwipotencjalnymoc prospektywnaznaczenie prospektywnegenetykaruchy organiczneHans Drieschkoncepcja neowitalistycznametodologiafilozofianauki przyrodniczewitalizmfilozofia przyrodyentelechyharmonious equipotential systemprospective powerprospective meaninggeneticsorganic movementsneo-vitalistic conceptmethodologyphilosophynatural sciencesvitalismphilosophy of natureArticle