Kuprjaniuk, Stanisław2024-11-152024-11-152015Studia Ełckie, 2015, T. 17, nr 3, s. 225-236.1896-68962353-1274https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23632Across the geographical landscape of Warmia one can point numerous architectural objects which exist as war memorials and were built in honour of the Warmia inhabitants fallen during the World War I. However, among them there are also objects which architecture is convergent with the one of the Warmia wayside shrines as far as the material used for building – bricks, and their Gothic Revival style. Long-term studies confirmed that some of the shrines accepted by the state departments of cultural heritage protection are indeed war memorials. This clear example of misunderstanding within architectural types classification was observed in Długobór. The article and the conducted proof explanation are dedicated to this object. The reason for classification of the shrines, this one and similar objects on Biesowo, Lubomino, Lutry and Tolkowiec was removing commemorative and military elements from these objects, although such elements were initially endowed with those emblems. Explaining the problem of the Długobór memorial classification was the first step towards further researches regarding various forms of the war memorials in Warmia.plCC-BY-NC-ND - Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnychwayside shrinessmall sacral architecturewar memorialsEast PrussiaWarmiakapliczki przydrożnemała architektura sakralnapomniki wojennePrusy Wschodniearchitekturaarchitecturemała architekturasmall architecturecrosskrzyżkrzyże przydrożnewayside crossesProblemy z klasyfikacją obiektów małej architektury na przykładzie pomnika wojennego w DługoborzeProblems of the Classification of Small Architecture Based on the War Memorial in DługobórArticle