Szymik, Stefan2024-11-182024-11-182020The Biblical Annals, 2020, T. 10, nr 3, s. 437-456.2083-22222451-2168https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23782Artykuł w języku angielskim.The paper contributes to the discussion regarding the Corinthian opponents of the resurrection of the dead (1 Cor 15:12). In particular, it attempts to re-examine the thesis of the Epicurean framework of this controversy. The first part focuses on the main lines of interpretation of 1 Cor 15:12 and the presentation of the Epicurean thesis. It is followed by an analysis of Paul’s polemical statements against the thesis of his Corinthian opponents, “there is no resurrection of the dead” (1 Cor 15:12; cf. vv. 19, 29-34, 35). It is assumed that Paul clearly says that his opponents deny a bodily resurrection and future life – there is nothing after death. The third part of the paper reconsiders some hermeneutic factors concerning the identity of the Corinthian opponents of the resurrection. 1 Cor 15 contains terminological and ideological parallels to Epicureanism, especially, by way of opposition. Yet, the valuation of these data remains an open question.enCC-BY - Uznanie autorstwa1 Cor 15resurrectionresurrection of the deadNew TestamentepicureanismNew Testament-epicureanism relationshipFirst Letter to the Corinthiansletters of Saint PaulBiblebiblical studiespolemicsphilosophyexegesisbiblical exegesiszmartwychwstaniezmartwychwstanie umarłychNowy Testamentepikureizmrelacja Nowy Testament-epikureizmPierwszy List do Koryntianlisty św. PawłaBibliaPismo Świętebiblistykapolemikafilozofiaegzegezaegzegeza biblijnaArticle