Czyżowska, DorotaKalus, AlicjaWendołowska, Anna2024-12-062024-12-062024The Person and the Challenges, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 179-197.2083-8018https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/25095Zawiera tabele.Religiosity and dyadic coping are among the factors important for the quality of marriage, satisfaction with the relationship and the sense of happiness of the spouses. Wellbeing, mainly in the aspect of personal development or life goals, seems to be particularly important for couples planning to conceive a child in the near or distant future. The study involved 51 married couples postponing parenthood. Their dyadic coping, psychological well-being and the centrality of religiosity were studied. The actor-partner interdependence model was used for the dyadic analyses. There were no differences in the well-being between the spouses, however, women rated in dyadic coping and religiosity higher. The centrality of the spouses’ religiosity, and especially the congruence of their religious beliefs, seems to have a significant impact on their well-being. The obtained results seem to shed new light on the importance of dyadic coping by spouses and their religiosity for the well-being of each of them.enCC-BY-NC-ND - Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnychreligiousnesscentrality of religiositydelaying parenthooddyadic copingmarriagerelationshipswellbeingparenthoodfamilycoping with stressresearchreligijnośćcentralność religijnościopóźnianie rodzicielstwadiadyczne radzenie sobiemałżeństwozwiązkidobrostanrodzicielstworodzinaradzenie sobie ze stresembadaniaArticle