Wilkołek, Rafał2025-07-152025-07-152011Teologia w Polsce, 2011, Tom 5, nr 1, s. 139-154.2956-63551732-4572https://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/33674One of the principles of the scholastic Christology was the conviction about the necessity and possibility of creating the hypostatic union’s theological models. As theoretical constructions their roles were to make presenting of the new theological hypotheses easier. As the author of this article points out, remarkable medieval attempts of showing the hypostatic union with the correct patterns could be found in the works of Peter Abelard, Saint Bonaventure and Albert the Great. These models were rarely developing their intuitions suggesting the wider perspective only. Because of that the reader learns about systematic panoramic view of the 13th century Christology in the second turn. These are the three existing in that time theories pronounced by Peter Lombard in his Sentences. They define the limits of the medieval Christological reflection and they are the basis of Aquinas’ thought which by critically using the whole-part model is the most important subject of this article.plCC-BY - Uznanie autorstwaśredniowieczne modele unii hipostatycznejunia hipostatycznaśredniowieczne teorie unii hipostatycznejchrystologia Tomasza z AkwinuchrystologiaTomasz z Akwinuteologiastruktura chrystologii Tomasza z Akwinutło chrystologii Tomasza z Akwinudoktorzy Kościołateologia średniowiecznaśredniowieczescholastykateologia scholastycznachrystologia scholastycznamedieval models of hypostatic unionhypostatic unionmedieval theories of hypostatic unionThomas Aquinas’ ChristologyChristologyThomas Aquinastheologystructure of Thomas Aquinas’ Christologybackground of Thomas Aquinas’ ChristologyDoctors of the Churchmedieval theologyMiddle Agesscholasticismscholastic theologyscholastic ChristologyArticle