Wolak, Zbigniew2024-04-112024-04-112000Tarnowskie Studia Teologiczne, 2000, T. 19, cz. 2, s. 245-274.0239-4472http://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/15135This article deals with the problem of different kinds of reasoning used in the arguments for existence of God. Some mistakes in these arguments are effects of confusion in using philosophical and logical categories. Sometimes authors use logical terms but understand them in philosophical sense. This way of using logic can lead to misunderstandings and mistakes. In this paper there is a number of examples of arguments for existence of God and there are pointed out some logical mistakes made in them.plAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Polandhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/filozofiafilozofia Bogadowody na istnienie Bogaistnienie Bogalogikaargumentacjabłędy formalnebłądbłąd wieloznacznościBógphilosophyphilosophy of Godexistence of Godlogicargumentationformal errorserrorerror of ambiguityGodevidence for the existence of GodArticle