Theo-logos
Teologiczne repozytorium cyfrowe „Theo-logos” gromadzi i udostępnia w otwartym dostępie polskie publikacje z dziedziny nauk teologicznych, a także dyscyplin: nauki o kulturze i religii oraz prawo kanoniczne.
Zbiory w DSpace
Przeszukaj kolekcje
- Czasopisma naukowe zawierające publikacje z dziedziny nauk teologicznych, a także dyscyplin nauki o kulturze i religii oraz prawo kanoniczne.
Najnowsze publikacje
Wybór Abrahama
Jasiński, Andrzej S. (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego UO, 2017)
Abraham’s choice was extremely important for the whole history of redemption described both in the Old and the New Testaments. Personal contact with God has brought the image of God being close to man. Abraham was considered to be Gods friend. He is perceived as such in all the three monotheistic religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The patriarch is thus the most “ecumenical” character of all and is called che “father of faith”. The historicity of Abraham has been presently widely discussed. The question has been studied from the historical, archaeological, ethnological and religiological perspectives. The covenant of God with Abraham was the first historical event that sealed human vertical relations. God ’s covenant with Noah had not been historical but merely human hopes of intimate relation with the Highest. It was God Himself to evoke the hopes in man. The description of the Noahite covenant was a prelude to Yahweh covenant with Abraham and his descendants. God’s choice of Abraham has changed human history for ever. Since then Yahweh would repeat. The tale of Isaac’s – Abraham’s son – binding (Gen 22:1-19) is one of the most thrilling texts in the whole Hebrew Bible After the chapter (Gen 21), Isaac, being born in fulfilment of God’s promise, the reader goes to the text where God demands from Abraham to sacrifice the boy. The text of Gen 22:1-19 is a mixture of E and J sources therefore the motifs described there must have been known in various Israeli traditions and were perceived as specially important issues of religious teaching.
Sprawiedliwość Boża według ksiąg prorockich w ujęciu dokumentu Papieskiej Komisji Biblijnej „Natchnienie i prawda Pisma Świętego”
Jasiński, Andrzej S. (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego UO, 2017)
The focus of the article is on the aspect of the prophetic speech according to the document of Pontifical Biblical Commission: The Inspiration and Truth of Sacred Scripture: The Word that Comes from God and Speaks of God for the Salvation of the World. The document is divided into three parts: the first considers the inspiration of Sacred Scripture, its origin from God; the second the truth of Sacred Scripture; and the third examines the exegesis of passages that present particular problems, either historical, or ethical and social. The second part of document in the paragraph Prophetic Books (number 72) refers to the question of Justice of God. The article analyzes several biblical passages (Lev 19:2; Deut 6:25; Isa 1:17; 5:7; 9:14-15; 26:2; 30:12- 14.18; 45:21; Jer 2:19; 6:14.19; 7,13-15; 9:3; 12,11; 23:17; 27:14; 28:8; 29:8-9; Ezek 13:10; 18:5-18; Amos 5:24; 9:10; Joel 2:12-14; Zeph 3:5; Zach 10:2) in which prophets write about justice of God and justice of man. According to the prophets, Israel is judged for its lack of social justice. The poor and needy are oppressed, denied justice in the courts and forced into slavery. The whole of the book of Amos is about justice. Isaiah affirms: judgment is coming, because of the injustice and inhumanity of the great and the Powerful towards the weak, poor and helpless. Jeremiah made plain just how highly God rates justice. Ezekiel, writing at around the same time, listing a catalogue of abuses with regard to the family, social justice, the temple cult, pagan worship, sexual matters, the legal system and economic justice. In all these areas, which cover the whole of social, economic and religious life, the people had violated the covenant and had forgotten the Lord. The prophets are agreed that God hates oppression. The YHWH will come and establish his justice on the earth.
Źródło, treść i adresaci Objawienia (Mt 11,25-30)
Rafiński, Grzegorz (Kuria Metropolitalna Gdańska, 1995)
Śmierć jako wydarzenie i wyobrażenie na Kaszubach Północnych. Studium etnograficzne
Perszon, Jan (Kuria Metropolitalna Gdańska, 1995)
Samuel: ostatni sędzia Izraela
Jasiński, Andrzej S. (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego UO, 2017)
Samuel’s epoch was preceded by the Judge’s times which showed the critical political condition of Israeli tribes in those days. God’s calling Samuel (1 Sam 3) began a new era for the Chosen People. Eli, holding the office of the Judge and the highest priest, was not in a position to guarantee the unity for the dispersed tribes. Failure in the fighc against the Philistines and the loss of the Covenant Box filled the measure of misfortune. After twenty years of hidden life Samuel enters the scene of Biblical hiscory (1 Sam 7,2-13,24). He anoints Saul of Beniamin tribe to be the king and thus initiates the monarchic epoch in Israeli history. The king’s duty was ti unite the dispersed tribes and to create a sufficient military force to defeat the Philistines or other enemies. The king enjoyed expecced military successes but used undue authority when he usurped the competence of a priest (1 Sam 13,13). Then, he disobeyed the herem, i.e. the demand to exterminate totally the people and live stock of Amalekites (1 Sam 15,9). This conduct led to rejection of Saul by Yahweh who chose another servant – David. Samuel, obedient to Yahweh, secretly anointed David in his family town, Bethlehem, as the ruler (1 Sam 16,12). As long as Samuel had been alive, Israel ruled by Saul succeeded but when the prophet died the situation changed radically. The ultimate defeat came from the Philistines. It was then that Saul was killed on Mount Gilboa. After the king’s death, the ruling powers came to David who proved to be the saviour of the people. Samuels mission was finally successfully fulfilled. He managed to establish a royal power in Israel, a power that showed to be vital to save the nation. After the hapless Saul’s kingship there came the golden time of David’s rule. David became a figure of the Messiah to come, Jesus Christ.