Roczniki Teologiczne, 1993, T. 40, z. 2
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/4728
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczne, 1993, T. 40, z. 2 wg Autor "Rusecki, Marian"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Maryjny aspekt cuduRusecki, Marian (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1993)In the popular vein of theological opinions, in folk religiousness and casuistry one may Find some opinions about Marian miracles, or else that it is She who sometimes makes miracles, especially in Marian sanctuaries. In view of these opinions the author has taken a critical stand, since it is always God who is the maker of a miracle (miracles). Mary in view of the role which She plays in the economy of salvation (the Mother of the Son of God, the Mother of the Church, all-intercessor of favours) intercedes (with the Son for us and pleads for a favour of His taumaturgie action for the benefit of natural good (health) and supernatural good of particular persons who particularly need it. In keeping with this, one may follow Benedict XIV and be justified in talking about the Marian aspect of miracle.Pozycja Tendencje irracjonalistyczne i ich przezwyciężanie w teologiiRusecki, Marian (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1993)Taken from the subject's point of view neither religion nor religious faith is exclusively the matter of human reason, but of the whole person and the grace of God. Both religion and faith in view of lived experience and religious experience are extremely complex. No wonder then that in the history of theological thought, which deals with their explication, also irrational tendencies have been given attention; those tendencies were usually conditioned by particular philosophical assumptions. Thus it was in the ancient times of Christianity (Tatian, Theophilus, Tertullian, and sects: Montanism, gnosis, Manichaeism, or Neoplatonism), in the Middle Ages (radical German mysticism, nominalism, Nicholas of Cusa), and in modern times (the Protestant faith of trust, fideism, traditionalism, Kantian agnosticism, idealism, modernism etc.). In keeping with the above Christinaity has often been charged with the accusation of irrationality, likewise faith and theology. The author has proved in a short analysis, starting from Jesus self-apology, that Catholic theology, apologetics and fundamental theology have alvays cared to show the rational foundations of Christianity as a revealed religion. They have also sought to show how reason participated in cognition and religious experience so that the act of faith was an act worthy of man as a rational person. Vatican Council I (Dei Filium) expressed it officially, and Vatican Council II has confirmed it extensively.