Roczniki Teologiczne, 2001, T. 48, z. 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/9159

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczne, 2001, T. 48, z. 1 wg Autor "Rakocy, Waldemar"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    2 Kor 1, 15-16: Pawłowy plan wizyt w Koryncie i jego realizacja
    Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2001)
    The subject of the article is the information in II Cor 1,15-16, according to which Paul did not put into effect the visit to the Corinthians that he had foretold. In the contemporary biblical studies there are two fundamental opinions on the degree to which the visit was not executed: 1) the Apostle did not make the foretold visit at all; 2) he made only half of it, that is from Corinth he went to Macedonia, but he did not return to Corinth as he had announced earlier. A verification of the two opinions leads to the conclusion that the latter one meets with objections that raise serious doubts; the former one does not create such difficulties and seems more plausible.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    2 Kor 10-13: „List we łzach”?
    Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2001)
    The literary unity of II Cor has been the subject of discussion for over two centuries. Most attention has been paid to the last four chapters of the Letter, suggesting – at the end of the previous century – that at least in some part it is the so called “Letter in tears” which Paul sent to Corinth before II Cor. The hypothesis that enjoyed a large popularity in the first half of the 20lh century was rejected by many scholars in the recent decades. The arguments that were put forward against it seem sufficient at the present stage of research to accept that it is not in keeping with the reality. Instead of the abandoned hypothesis the belief is enjoyed, especially in the Anglo-Saxon countries, that Chapters 10-13 were written some time after 1-9. Although equally important arguments against this hypothesis cannot be presented as against the previous one, this does not necessarily mean that it is true. If the literary unity of II Cor is not accepted, the solution to the problem should be looked for in the history of the Letter's redaction. Results of this research may lead to the conclusion that a solution of the intricate problem of Chapters 10-13 is beyond our possibilities.