Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1980, T. 27, z. 5
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/10184
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1980, T. 27, z. 5 wg Autor "Krukowski, Józef"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Prawa człowieka i prawa chrześcijanina. Problemy teoretyczno-prawneKrukowski, Józef (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1980)The article presents some problems connected with the project of the proclamation in Lex Ecclesiae Fundamentalis of two cathegories of historical rights of a human individual in social life, i.e. the basic rights of a man the basic rights of a Christian. First the principles of the Council and post-Council doctrine concerning the dignity of a human person in the natural and supernatural dimensions as well as the rights and duties of a person in social life (p. II) have been discussed. Then some chosen problems connected with the affirmation of these principles in the positive canonic law have been characterized. As it is known, the catalogue of the rights and duties of a Christian contained in the project of Lex Ecclesiae Fundamentalis met sharp criticism by many Catholic groups. The author mentions this criticism, but his main attention is drawn to the analysis of the mutual relations between „duty” and „authorization” in constructing a catalogue of rights of a man and rights of a Christian in the Catholic formulation.Pozycja Stanowisko soboru watykańskiego II wobec rozdziału Kościoła od państwaKrukowski, Józef (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1980)The paper presents the change in the doctrine of the Church which took place at the Second Vatican Council with respect to the system of separation of Church and State. It consists of two parts. The first part shows the discussion which was going on at the second Vatican Council on the problems connected with separation of Church and State. The authors of the projects of the Dogmatic Constitution on Church and the Declaration of Religious freedom, took a traditional attitude towards this system, i.e. a negative one. However, the Fathers of the Council speaking in the discussion on these projects insisted on a revision of this attitude, argueing that, among others, the system of separation is not realized in particular countries in the same way, and that it favours a stronger sense of responsibility for the Church with the congregation than the concordatory system. The second part of the paper discusses the basic principles contained in the Council’s resolutions (especially in the Constitution Gaudium et spes No 76 and in the Declaration Dignitatis humanae) on the relations between Church and State. They are as follows: pluralism of the autlooks on life, autonomy and mutual independence of Church and State, religious freedom and the freedom of the Church, reasonable cooperation of Church and State for the common good of the same people. The Council-refrained from a definite pronouncement on the separation of Church and State. However, the above principles which should be appied in every country, postulate a separation of Church and State rather than a close unity between them.Pozycja Zenon Grocholewski. Documenta recentiora circa rem matrimonialem et processualem cum noris bibliographicis et indicibus. Volumen alterum. Romae 1980. Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana.Krukowski, Józef (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1980)