Przeglądaj wg Autor "Burakowska, Agnieszka"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 5 z 5
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja A Deadly Covenant: Mimetic interpretation of Acts 5:1–11Burakowska, Agnieszka (Gdańskie Seminarium Duchowne, 2013)This is an attempt of a mimetic interpretation of Acts 5:1‒11. The article juxtaposes the narrative of Ananias and Sapphira with the story of the sudden death of Nadab and Abihu from Lev 10:1‒7. The Author argues that apart from situational resemblance, both passages are similar on a deeper level: they are set at the beginning of new orders. Ananias and Sapphira are Adam and Eve of the early Christian community and like them violate their marital unity. Since marriage has become a symbol of Christ’s faithful and loving relationship to humanity, the couple’s treacherous connivance constitutes the ‘original sin’ of Christianity. Nevertheless, as a sacrificial text, Acts 5:1‒11 has had a negative influence on Christian religiosity.Pozycja Kuszenie JezusaBurakowska, Agnieszka (Wydawnictwo Pallottinum, 2006)Pozycja Pascha Jezusa, nasza PaschaBurakowska, Agnieszka (Wydawnictwo Pallottinum, 2011)The Passover faces us with an age-old quandary: God willed His Son’s death and at the same time that He did not desire it; we are all guilty of Jesus’ crucifixion, though it happened according to God’s plan. Many solutions were tried, among which the juridical one, built on the theory of Adam’s fault, became dominant, even though it has aroused various objections through ages. René Girard’s mimetic theory offers a possibility of the reinterpretation of the salvific events. Setting out from his notion of violence as the original sin, I assume that fighting scapegoating as human sinfulness brought Jesus to the cross, and that this act was not only willed, and predicted by God, but also it still needs to be completed. God intervened, raised Jesus from death, and granted people victory in His Son. Jesus’ resurrection is an extraordinary event because He forgave and accepted people – His murderers – as His Bride and partner. Therefore, we are called to unite with the Lamb and to follow Him on that gruelling path of purification from Adam’s sin by receiving His Spirit and by offering ourselves to the wellbeing and purification of the other.Pozycja Posługa duszpasterska a teoria mimetyczna: zarys kursuBurakowska, Agnieszka; Eggen, Wiel (Gdańskie Seminarium Duchowne, 2013)Artykuł prezentuje zarys treści czteroletniego kursu na studiach doktoranckich i podyplomowych, którego kanwę stanowi teoria mimetyczna Girarda spajająca wykłady z antropologii, teologii biblijnej i dogmatyki. Na pierwszym roku podejmowane są zagadnienia początków Izraela, następnie okres Drugiej Świątyni, na trzecim – synoptyczne i Pawłowe ujęcie nowości Jezusa Chrystusa, na czwartym – Janowa wizja zbawienia człowieka. Ponadto, po ogólnym wprowadzeniu, w ciągu trzech kolejnych lat Autorzy kursu korzystają z trójfunkcyjnej hipotezy Georgesa Dumézila dotyczącej kultury europejskiej, rozważając kryzys w świecie idei, kwestię przywództwa oraz konkretną, duszpasterską pomoc. Mimetyczna interpretacja wszystkich sakramentów z Eucharystią w centrum przynosi świeże spojrzenie na sprawy pastoralne i duchowe.Pozycja That they be all – together holy in truth (Jn 17,19)Burakowska, Agnieszka; Eggen, Wiel (Gdańskie Seminarium Duchowne, 2011)In a succinct formula, Jn 17,19 describes the foundation of the Church as our sharing in the holiness and truth to which Jesus commits himself. To ponder the depth of this verse the article calls on René Girard’s mimetic theory and Jan Patočka’s phenomenology. e latter’s notion of ‘care of the soul’ in Socratic sense illustrates what it means to shun any distraction from commitment to the ‘wholeness of the world’, whereas Girard’s theory of the dominant mimesis shows how this openness is constantly pulled into the mechanism of scapegoating and rivalry. Together they portray the immense challenge of humanity, being called to a total truthfulness of integrity, to which the faith of Christ opens the way. For them the truth has a practical dimension: responsibility for oneself and the world (Patočka) and overcoming in oneself sacrificial logic.