Przeglądaj wg Autor "Crimella, Matteo"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 8 z 8
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Anthony Giambrone, Sacramental Charity, Creditor Christology, and the Economy of Salvation in Luke’s Gospel (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 439; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017). Pp. XV + 366. € 89. ISBN 978-31-615-48-59-8Crimella, Matteo (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Francis J. Moloney, A Body Broken for a Broken People: Divorce, Remarriage and the Eucharist (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2015). Pp. 303. £14,99. ISBN 978-0-232-53204-3Crimella, Matteo (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2016)Pozycja Hermeneutical and Exegetical Assumptions in the Work Jesus of Nazareth by Joseph Ratzinger/ Benedict XVI. Some ExamplesCrimella, Matteo (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2024)This article examines Joseph Ratzinger’s trilogy on Jesus of Nazareth, focusing especially on the first volume, shedding light on three of his hermeneutical assumptions. Firstly, there is a consideration of the understanding of the historical reliability of the Gospels. Secondly, there is a focus on the double hermeneutic of the parables, namely, the hermeneutic of history and that of faith. A critical review of Ratzinger’s analysis of three Lucan parables (Luke 10:25–37; 15:11–32; 16:19–31) leads to the proposal of a different reading which avoids the allegorical trap and values the argumentative mechanism of the fictitious stories, understood as frontier of the Gospel. Finally, holiness is touched on as an authentic interpretation of Sacred Scripture.Pozycja Martha, the Hostess, and Mary, the Listener. A Discussion with the Feminist Interpretation of Luke 10:38–42Crimella, Matteo (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2022)This article examines the pericope of Luke 10:38–42 following the gender approach. It presents the contributions of E. Schüssler Fiorenza and of M. Perroni who have interpreted the passage according to a feminist approach. The former has developed some hermeneutical criteria while the latter has insisted on female discipleship, claiming that, for Luke, the women are believers but not missionaries. The article turns critically on the essential points of the two contributions, showing that a careful philological and contextual analysis does not allow the episode to be read as a representation of ministry in the Church. Instead, Mary’s behaviour appears alienating, for, placing herself the Lord’s feet, she performs an action which is surprising and not inscribed in the social canons. The episode lays stress on precisely this difference, showing that the two poles are not “service” and “listening” but “distracting preoccupations” and a “disciple’s attitude.” The behaviour of the two sisters thus functions as a mirror in which the reader is invited to discern different attitudes towards Jesus.Pozycja Psałterz i modlitwaCrimella, Matteo (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2021)W ostatnich 25 latach zmienił się paradygmat badań nad psalmami: nastąpiło przejście od studium poszczególnych utworów, rozważanych oddzielnie, do studium Psałterza jako księgi. To nowe podejście (zwane „holistycznym” lub „kanonicznym”) nie może ograniczać się do sal uniwersyteckich, lecz powinno znaleźć swoje miejsce w praktyce modlitwy, zwłaszcza w Liturgii Godzin. Artykuł stanowi propozycję, aby modlić się psalmami zgodnie z ich kolejnością, odtwarzając w ten sposób bieg Psałterza: od lamentacji do uwielbienia, od błagania do dziękczynienia, od królowania Dawida do królowania Boga. Jest również sugestią, aby odkryć na nowo trzy cechy psalmów: poezję, modlitwę i śpiew. Śpiew, wykonywany przy pomocy głosu, wskazuje na wykorzystanie ciała podczas modlitwy – podkreśla ono nie tylko charakter ludzkiej odpowiedzi na Boże wezwanie, ale także uwypukla antropologiczny udział w wydarzeniu zbawczym. Słowo liryczne, które staje się modlitwą i śpiewem, uczestniczy w przywilejach Słowa Bożego. Na koniec poddano analizie kilka psalmów sąsiadujących: Ps 120–124, Ps 111–112 i Ps 150, który zamyka Psałterz.Pozycja The Infancy Canticles in LukeCrimella, Matteo (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2022)The article focuses on the four canticles in Luke’s Infancy Narrative (Magnificat, Benedictus, Gloria and Nunc dimittis) and puts a question about why there is a passage from prose to poetry. The studies of the so-called inset psalms and the research on the Psalter as a book led to a backward and a forward approach. The former is that of intertextuality, showing how Luke’s canticles evoke texts of the Old Testament. Alluding to Scripture, whose status as inspired and canonical text is a truth that concerns the protagonists, the evangelist and also the recipients of the work, the narrator invites the reader to accept that hymn as the Word of God for today. The latter highlights “melodic lines” introduced by the canticles in the works of Luke (Gospel and Acts). The four canticles are closely concatenated so as to become privileged hermeneutical places for understanding the sense of the whole narrative. Why, then, does Luke introduce his canticles? They underline their strongly anthropological value and represent a response to the salvific event. This response participates in the event itself because only through it is communicated the fullness of what the Lord has performed, is performing and will perform in the future.Pozycja Veridizione e Verità nel Racconto di LucaCrimella, Matteo (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2017)The article proposes the two itineraries inside the Gospel of Luke. The first one is gnoseologic as it tries to illumine the process of veridiction brought about by the narrative itself, according to the narrative pact established by Luke (cf. Luke 1,1-4). Here, the reader is called to a continuous interpretative exercise with respect to the person of Christ who is presented first in the Infancy narrative and then in the course of his ministry. The second itinerary belongs to the “reception history” and it’s connected with the search for Jesus (ζητέω). It regards the anthropological turn, stemming from the same disclosure of the historical figure of the Nazarene, the turn that leads to the manifestation of God’s truth.Pozycja Λογικὴ λατρεία (Rom 12:1). The Pauline Idea of Worship between the Hebrew and Hellenistic WorldsCrimella, Matteo (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2021)This essay focuses on a passage from Paul’s Letter to the Romans, in particular on an expression: λογικὴ λατρεία (Rom 12:1). After having studied its context in some depth, it shows how Paul operates in a dual direction: the apostle removes from the expression any semantic link bound up with worship; he also attributes to it a profane semantic. Paul does not intend to oppose the two worships, Jewish and Christian. His words imply that, like ancient Israel before them, the Christian believers should also be distinguished for their worship. Christian worship is conceived differently. It is far from being a spiritualization of worship. Such a reduction is excluded by the object of the sacrifice, “your bodies.” Paul operates in two directions: on the one hand, he avoids the trap of supersessionism with regard to Jewish worship; on the other hand, he excludes a spiritualization (or interiorization) of Greek religious practices. Paul’s language is distinct both from the grand tradition of Israel and from the Hellenistic world.