Przeglądaj wg Autor "Ferdek, Bogdan"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 20 z 69
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Aktywność w KościeleFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1995)Pozycja Bóg daje nam przyszłośćFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1999)Pozycja Bóg powołuje człowiekaFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1993)Pozycja Bogdan Giemza SDS (red.), Wędrówki przez rok kościelny z Benedyktem XVI, Kraków 2007, ss. 328.Ferdek, Bogdan (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2007)Pozycja „Charta Oecumenica” jako nowy impuls dla ekumeniiFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2002)Pozycja ChciwośćFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1995)Pozycja Chrystus czy Wodnik?Ferdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2004)The New Age is almost always connected with alternatives. One of such dominant alternatives in the New Age thought is the question: Christ or Aquarius? Aquarius is the name of a constellation that will influence the humanity during the next 2130 years. This astrological view is the central dogma of the New Age. The mystery of Jesus Christ can be approached in the spirit of the contextual theology by means of the idea of water. He is the bearer of the living water which He promises to the Samaritan. And because Jesus Christ is the bearer of the living water he can be named the true Aquarius. Aquarius is the name of a constellation and Christ is the One by whom everything was created, together with constellations. Aquarius is the expression of the longing for salvation, and Christ – is the very salvation Himself. Aquarius cannot be brought to harmony with Christ because of two problems. First: Aquarius presents himself as an alternative excluding Christ, and – secondly – Christ is the only one Savior. This salvation touches the whole cosmos, together with the constellation of Aquarius and is offered even to those who believe in Aquarius.Pozycja Cud rozmnożenia chleba – zapowiedzią EucharystiiFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1994)Pozycja Czy cierpiący Bóg może być piękny? Odpowiedź lady Juliany z NorwichFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2012)Pozycja Dałeś nam chleb z niebaFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1993)Pozycja Deklaracja „Dominus Iesus” jako współczesne wyznanie wiaryFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2001)In times of special controversies in regard to the truths of faith the Church always used to announce some updated forms of faith. These Credos draw our attention to the articles of faith that are in danger of being neglected. As is plain to see, the Vatican declaration Dominus Iesus has a clear structure of such a Credo. We find there a formula „it is to be firmly believed” repeated eight times. The declaration was meant to be a modern Credo in the time of the Great Jubilee, a Credo wich proclaims that Jesus is Lord. To this purpose another fomula – one God, one Christ, one Church – is obviously a chosen means. The Vatican declaration stays against any attempt to break the unity of those notions, mentioned already in the Nicean-Constantinople Credo.Pozycja Dogmatyka „Modlitwy Pańskiej”Ferdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1999)Pozycja Duchowe zmartwychwstanieFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1999)Pozycja Dwie nadzieje na koniec końca: Ernst Bloch i Joseph Ratzinger/Benedykt XVIFerdek, Bogdan (Wydawnictwo Pallottinum, 2019)The difference between Bloch’s blasphemy philosophy and Ratzinger’s theology of hope lies in the fact that the former is the ontology of what is not yet and the latter the ontology of what is already coming. Kosian rightly described Bloch’s philosophy as „futurocentrism.” It assumes understanding the future as futurum, that is, what is predictable, what lies in the possibilities of man and is an improved extension of the present. Ratzinger does not reject the future as a futurum, although for him this futurum is carried by adventus, a future that can not be planned, a prediction that is not within the limits of human possibilities for which God’s Creator’s inexhaustible possibilities stand. Adventus does not determine human freedom, but can be accepted as a gift accepted by human freedom.Pozycja E. Gruber, S. Fassberg, New Age Wörterbuch, Herder: Freiburg-Basel-Wien 1988Ferdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1993)Pozycja Ekumeniczna lektura chrystologii Dietricha BonhoefferaFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2008)Christology is a methodical reflection on the event of Jesus Christ revealed in the Bible. Is it possible to accept the Christological reflections of an Evangelical theologian in the Catholic Christology? In our ecumenical lecture on D. Bonhoeffer’s Christology, the category of solidarity will be helpful. Pope John Paul II wrote about it in the encyclical Sollicitudo rei socialis. According to John Paul II, the virtue of solidarity is “a commitment to the good of one’s neighbor with the readiness, in the gospel sense, to ‘lose oneself’ for the sake of the other instead of exploiting him, and to ‘serve him’ instead of oppressing him for one’s own advantage”. Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s dogmatics shows ecumenical consonance, i.e., the faith confessed by both Evangelicals and Catholics in the mystery of the Incarnation. This ecumenical consonance also refers to the idea of the Church as the Body of Christ and eschatology as the temple, and even a connection of sacraments with the Word of God. Still, there is no passing over the ecumenical problems that still divide Evangelicals and Catholics. These ecumenical problems involve some issues within the realms of ecclesiology and sacramentology. A basis for ecumenical dialogue about issues that still divide Evangelicals and Catholics may be Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s ecumenical Christology of solidarity which he summarized thus: „The human being was created as a body, in the body – because of us – ‘the Son of God appeared on earth’, in the body He rose again, in the body the believer takes Christ the Lord in the sacrament, and the Resurrection of the dead will bring about full spiritual-physical community among God’s creatures. The Solidarity of Christ continues for the entire history of salvation: from creation through incarnation, reconciliation, and the Church, up to the eschaton.Pozycja Emery de Gaál, The Theology of Pope Benedict XVI: The Christocentric Shift, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2010, ss. 365.Ferdek, Bogdan (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2012)Pozycja Encyklika „Ecclesia de Eucharistia” w perspektywie ekumenicznejFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2003)The fourteenth encyclical letter of John Paul II entitled Ecclesia de Eucharistia was taken as a source for theological reflection during a conference at the Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, held on May 13, 2003. Four theologians gave their contributions during this meeting. The starting point was a lecture by the Rector of the Faculty, Prof. Ignacy Dec. In his text Fr. Rector underlined the fact that we have in front of us the first papal encyclical of the new century and the new millennium. Important is the fact that the Pontiff frequently refers there to his personal experience of a priest, a bishop, a cardinal, and finally the pope. The next three interventions by Prof. Roman Rogowski and later Fr. Bogdan Ferdek and Fr. Andrzej Siemieniewski developed the main topics of the papal encyclical along three lines. The dogmatic importance of the letter was discussed, especially in connection with theological trends of ecclesiastical dissent and dogmatic uncertainty. The ecumenical side of Ecclesia de Eucharistia was then proposed as a sound foundation for a much needed reconciliation among Christian communities. In the end of the Wroclaw meeting some liturgical and pastoral points of the papal letter were highlighted in order to make the whole picture closer to the everyday life of Catholic communities for whom the Eucharist is a regular form of worship and as such needs both a deeply lived experience and a solid theological reflection.Pozycja Eschatologia i wolnośćFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1999)Pozycja Eschatologia nowych ruchów religijnychFerdek, Bogdan (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 1993)