Przeglądaj wg Autor "Hanc, Wojciech"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 11 z 11
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Aldona Dydek, „Ordynacja kobiet”. Problemy i pytania otwarte w kontekście dialogu ekumenicznego, Kraków 2017, 270 s. (Horyzonty Dogmatu, 4)Hanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Autorytet Pisma Świętego podstawą ekumenicznego działaniaHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1982)Pozycja Człowiek jako istota relacyjnaHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Eklezjotwórczy charakter EucharystiiHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Świętego Krzyża, 1992)Pozycja Ekumeniczny wymiar apostolskości Kościoła w głównych tradycjach wyznaniowychHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Pallottinum, 2012)The ecumenical dimension of „apostolicity” is one of the crucial stamps of Christ Church. Although it tends to be perceived in different ways by various confessional traditions, the context of its elucidation, including the concepts of “unity, sanctity and catholicity/universality”, shows their strict interdependence, complementarity and coinherence, indicating its primitive source. Besides, neither apostolicity nor other Church attributes can be understood or perceived without close relationships with Christ’s mission and the mission of the Hole Spirit. Therefore, “any distortion or depreciation of at least one of the qualities deforms the reality of Church” (P. Evdokimov). No wonder that nearly all Churches and ecclesial Communions confess, following the Councils Nicaea – Constantinople, their faith in “one holy catholic and apostolic Church” Among five positions being in relation to the Apostolicity of Church, analyzed in the present article the ones assume and explain this quality (Roman-Catholic, Orthodox and Anglican positions), whereas the others, loyal to the Reformation events, only slightly touched upon this issue (Lutheran and Calvinist Traditions). It is to mention that all confessional traditions, relying on the Messages of the New Testament, refer their reflections to the “Apostolic College”, to Apostles and to the Non-Divided Church. Obviously, each of the confessions mentioned above, according to the recognized theological assumptions and hermeneutical ecumenical principles as well as in compliance with the hermeneutics of their own confessional principles (it concerns particularly Lutheran, Calvinist and Anglican Traditions) acknowledges and confesses their faith in the apostolicity of Church and in the other qualities of the Body of Christ (notae Ecclesiae). And the statement expressed by K. Barth, one of the most important XX-century Reformed theologian that “although the apostolicity is not on the same level as the other qualities, it serves as their explanation” does not contradict above. That goes without saying that the traditions of Reformation Church comprehend the Apostolic Succession in a different way Moreover, they take a different attitude towards such issues as ecclesiastical office, priestly ordinations and , particularly, primacy, papal infallibility and jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome, which are closely connected with the apostolicity. Consequently, the problems discussed above should be the subject of further discussions and explanations within multilateral as well as bilateral ecumenical dialogues.Pozycja Ekumenizm a wielkie religie monoteistyczneHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższego Instytutu Teologicznego w Częstochowie, 2014)The Second Vatican Council, together with their messages and indications made a breakthrough in a number of important issues, especially in interfaith and interreligious relations. Complementing this was the very fruitful and fraught with consequences pontificate of John Paul II with his encyclical Ut unum sint (1995) and with several statements and declarations related to the Roman Catholic Church relations with other Christians and followers of other religions. It is significant that the Pope speaks first about the “dialogic” attitude corresponding to the nature and its dignity and then he refers this attitude to life and ecumenical activities, and above all, to work within the Christian traditions, and then to religions outside of Christianity. All this testifies of the consequences of the opening of the Church to the whole surrounding reality. The author of the article, taking into consideration his research and analytical achievements, especially in relation to emerging opinions as to include into the notion of ecumenism the relationship of the Church to other religions, tries to answer a few questions: such as what is ecumenism (ecumenical movement) in the modern sense of the word and what it reflects in the interfaith and interreligious relations, where among otherwise believers in God were chosen two monotheistic religions: Judaism and Islam. Therefore, in the first part the article outlines contemporary look at the concept of ecumenism as well as at its important parts and among them: overcoming historical obstacles and prejudices, ecumenical dialogue and its effects, the necessity of interfaith cooperation, the prayer, especially the one within the Community and the continual desire for renewal and reform of the Church. The article presents also the current state of the unifying activity. In the second part the author, by asking the question: the ecumenism or interreligious dialogue? tries to answer it by putting another searching question namely if we can equate the ecumenical movement with a religious dialogue, especially the one led by the Roman Catholic Church with Jews and Judaism, as well as with Muslims and Islam. In the third, summarizing part of the article, the author presents several findings resulting from the analysis, and between them such that ecumenism (ecumenical movement) due to the content of the concept and its scope applies only to Christians. However, the “ecumenical” attitude in reference to the followers of other religions allows you to interact and conduct an interreligious dialogue in a manner consistent with the Christian-Catholic identity. It should be emphasized that ecumenical dialogue can serve here only as a pattern, not necessarily leading to a consensus, because the differences in faith between religions are extremely deep. Therefore, you can only talk about interfaith relations and an interreligious dialogue, and not discuss ecumenism, even in a broad or very broad sense, which was demonstrated on the example of the relationship and dialogue between the Roman Catholic Church and Judaism and Islam.Pozycja Eucharystia sakramentem chrześcijańskiej jednościHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1974)Pozycja Kościół Chrystusowy sakramentem jedności wszystkich chrześcijanHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo św. Krzyża, 1978)Pozycja Ksiądz profesor Lucjan Napoleon Balter teolog – ekumenista – józefologHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Pallottinum, 2010)Pozycja Misterium Kościoła w prawosławiuHanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Przynależność do ludu Bożego (Spojrzenie ekumeniczne)Hanc, Wojciech (Wydawnictwo św. Krzyża, 1975)