Przeglądaj wg Autor "Karbownik, Henryk"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 12 z 12
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Ks. J. Krętosz. Organizacja archidiecezji lwowskiej obrządku łacińskiego od XV w. do 1772 roku. Lublin 1986 ss. 366+3 mapkiKarbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1987)Pozycja Ks. Tadeusz Walachowicz. Kościół katolicki w prawodawstwie Księstwa Warszawskiego. Lublin 1984 ss. 211.Karbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1985)Pozycja Ks. Wojciech Góralski. Statuty synodu płockiego bpa Andrzeja Chryzostoma Załuskiego z 1698 r. Płock 1984 ss. 206.Karbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1985)Pozycja Ks. Wojciech Góralski: Reforma trydencka w diecezji i prowincji kościelnej mediolańskiej w świetle pierwszych synodów kard. Karola Boromeusza, Lublin: RW KUL, 1988 ss. 443.Karbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1988)Pozycja Ofiary „iura stolae” w świetle ustawodawstwa synodalnego w Polsce przedrozbiorowej (1279-1765)Karbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1986)Pozycja Ogólnopolskie sympozjum nt. nie znanych synodów w Polsce przedrozbiorowejKarbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1983)Pozycja Opodatkowanie duchowieństwa i dóbr kościelnych w Królestwie Polskim (1815-1863)Karbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1990)The title of the present paper The Taxation of the Clergy and Church Properties in the Kingdom o f Poland (1815-1863) contains some information about the subject-matter which is under consideration here. The paper is divided into four chapters. The first shows the endowment of the then clergy which consisted of the incomes from beneficiary land, from tithes, rents on capital, iura slolae fees and the salaries paid by the government. The second chapter discusses the taxes paid by the clergy and serfs on church properties. To these services belong: the victim's tax, hearth-tax, subsidium charilalivum, tax for the army and extraordinary tax – the socalled collection of taxes passed by the Sejm during the Warsaw uprising. The third chapter presents the fees which constitute as it were adifferent group of taxes. They included stamp fees the fees for statutory work for the upkeep of roads and highways, and road and bridge taxes. The fourth chapter discusses the obligations for the benefit of the Polish army such as: billeting of soldiers on church buildings, delivery of agricultural products, requisition of horses for the Polish army during the Warsaw uprising, and seizure of church jewellery. It comes from the investigation that the clergy and church properties were in principle taxed for the benefit of the state. If there were any exemptions, they concerned only small matters, eg. road and bridge tax-exemption for the clergy who were going to the sick or an exemption of medicant cloisters from some obligations.Pozycja Sprawa obciążeń stanu duchowego w Polsce na rzecz państwa od połowy XVII wieku do 1795 rokuKarbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1981)Pozycja Sprawa opłat iura stolae w Księstwie Warszawskim i Królestwie Polskim w latach 1807-1914Karbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1988)After the creation of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw in 1807, French legislation was introduced in it, and along with this legislation the registries whose management was in charge of parish priests. In 1809 a decree was issued. It contained a fixed rate of fees which were supposed to be paid to the clerk of a registry for his office work. If a religious service was connected with this work, then a parish pariest took half of the fee fixed for civil work, because he performed this service. The fixed rate of fees was not eagerly charged by the religious clergy, because it did not embrace all kinds of religious service; thus a new rate was worked out and declared in 1818 at the time o f Polish Kingdom. It embraced only religious services, hence the rate of 1809 was still valid. In the 1850s the Russian government set to work out a new rate, bishops would send their projects, but the government stopped at confirming the operative rates of 1809 and 1818, and nothing changed in this matter until the end of the period in question.Pozycja Taksy opłat „iura stolae” w przedrozbiorowej PolsceKarbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1987)Pozycja Urząd interreksa w Polsce przedrozbiorowejKarbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie, 1995)The office of regent (Latin: interrex) in Poland before the partitions in 1795 originated on the basis of interregnum, the interval between the end of one monarch’s reign and the beginning of his successor’s rule. During this short period there had to be someone who would direct the election of the next king and who would care for the security of the State. The office of regent appeared and developed in the interregnum during the reign of the Jagiellonian dynasty. However, it was legally approved in the epoch of elected kings. The regent’s power was also increased. According to the law the office of regent was to be held by the Primate of Poland. He consulted a council which was summoned in 1632. The regent had the right to summon local assemblies, extraordinary sessions of Parliament as well as the elective assembly of Parliament. His duty was the concern for the defence of the State’s borders in case of enemies’ invasion — to give mobilisation orders — the consultation with the commanders-in-chief, conducting foreign affairs, announcing or nominating the elected king, preparing „pactorum conventorum”, crowning royal heads and rewarding. Taking into consideration the sources it is evident th at the regent did not have such great powers as the monarch. The ordinances of the regent had the effect of wielding power in the domain of administration.Pozycja Wiadomość o synodzie diecezji krakowskiej z 1443 rokuKarbownik, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1983)