Przeglądaj wg Autor "Naumowicz, Cezary"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 6 z 6

Cierpiętliwy Bóg nadziei Jürgena Moltmanna. Kontekst – problematyka – perspektywy
Naumowicz, Cezary (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2009)
Debata o paruzji Chrystusa w teologii protestanckiej
Naumowicz, Cezary (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2013)
The subject of the Second Coming of Christ at the end of time has aroused passionate debate in theological circles in the last decades. The emphasis on demythologisation in modern theology led to a certain scepticism about the Parousia. Some Protestant interpretations reduced the Parousia from the category of event to that of symbol (Bultmann, early Barth), while Moltmann defended the expectation of the Parousia. For Barth the content of “the future of Christ” is only an “unveiling” of what has already been achieved in the paschal mystery. But for Moltmann the category of “unveiling” needs the addition of that of a final and definitive “complement.” Both the unity of and the distinction between the “already” and the “not yet” of the Christ event can apparently be maintained by extending our understanding of the Parousia into the Trinitarian, ecclesiological, anthropological and cosmic areas.
Konstytucja Benedykta XII „Benedictus Deus”. Próba nowego spojrzenia na kontrowersję
Naumowicz, Cezary (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2010)
Powab joachimizmu. Interpretacja myśli Joachima z Fiore we współczesnej teologii
Naumowicz, Cezary (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2009)
Joachim of Fiore developed a vision of the whole of history, with a strongly eschatological orientation, based on the doctrine of the Trinity and divided into three successive eras: the age of the Father, that of the Son, and the final, spiritually perfect, age of the Spirit. Some contemporary theologians are influenced by this original theology and also critique it. H. de Lubac comes to a negative judgement on Joachim’s vision because it undermines the truth about Christological fulfilment. H. U. von Balthasar appreciates the basic intuition of the Calabrian abbot, while seeking to put right what is distored in it by underlining the permanent work of the Holy Spirit in the Church. J. Moltmann appropriates Joachim’s Trinitarian schema, but refuses to see the three aspects as three successive stages. He also interprets Joachim’s eschatology and that of Thomas Aquinas as two complementary sides of Christian hope.
Zu den letzten Dingen. Neue Perspektiven der Eschatologie, red. T. Herkert, M. Remenyi, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 2009, ss. 224.
Naumowicz, Cezary (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2010)
Związek między grzechem i śmiercią w aktualnej refleksji teologicznej
Naumowicz, Cezary (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2011)
In Christian tradition death is seen as a result of original sin. The relationship of sin with death is a serious problem for modern man and also for theology. Death is seen as the inevitable consequence of our finitude. Liberal Protestant theology of the 19th century totally denied a cause and effect relationship between sin and physical death. Later Protestant development (W. Pannenberg, J. Moltmann) recognized that finitude does not always mean mortality. In Catholic theology the problem remains open as a subject of enquiry. Our physical death is the result of original sin: if not necessarily in itself as a biological phenomenon, certainly as human death, which we are aware of and which we experience as aggression against our existence. In Christ we receive the hope of definitive immortality and eternal life, though this can in no way be compared with original immortality, which is still at risk of being lost through sin.