Przeglądaj wg Autor "Paciorek, Antoni"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 20 z 21
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja 1 Kor 15, 3b-8 syntezą chrześcijańskiej doktryny o śmierci i zmartwychwstaniu JezusaPaciorek, Antoni (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2010)St Paul’s text of 1 Cor 15 3b-8 in a concise and schematic way gives the basic data concerning Jesus’ death, funeral, resurrection and manifestations. It is a true synthesis of the Christian doctrine on the death and resurrection of Christ the Redeemer. The author of the article first discusses the literary aspect of St Paul’s words; he analyzes the context, tradition, edition and the structure of the text, and then he carefully interprets it from the exegetic and theological point of view.Pozycja Aktualność egzegezy patrystycznejPaciorek, Antoni (Instytut Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 1981)Pozycja „Błogosławieni...” – etyczne wymogi ośmiu błogosławieństw (Mt 5, 3-12)Paciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2004)First the author discusses the problems connected with the literary layer of the blessings (I), then the meaning of particular verses (II), and finally some theological ideas of the pericope, as well as concluding remarks (III). Explaining the first blessing the author thinks that xw nvcOpaxt should be understood as dat. Instrumentalis (“with spirit”) and at the same time relationis (“in spirit”). The second blessing refers to those who are sad because Christ and God seem to be “the great absentees” from the modem world. Gentle ones are those who are not indignant about adversities that life brings and can keep patient. To hunger and thirst for righteousness means to desire a life that is accordant with the Father’s will. Coming to somebody’s aid and forgiving is a characteristic of merciful people; and showing mercy to other people is a manifestation of mercy actually received from God. Blessing people who are pure in heart concerns people in whom there is no falsehood or spite, people who look for the good and try to be honest towards God and their neighbors. “Peacemakers” are those who act for establishing conditions in which everybody may develop according to G od’s plan. People who suffer for the sake of righteousness are the ones who are persecuted because of their desire to lead their lives according to God’s will.Pozycja Chrystocentryzm alegorii chrześcijańskiej w starożytnej hermeneutyce biblijnejPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1997)Pozycja Duch Święty jako dar w Liście do HebrajczykówPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1999)In the Letter to the Hebrews the word rtvebpa (pneuma) appears twelve times in total (1,7.14; 2,4; 3,7; 4,12; 6,4; 9,8.14; 10,15.29; 12,9.23). In seven cases, as it seems, it refers to the Holy Spirit (2,4; 3,7; 6,4; 9,8.14; 10,15.29). Analyzing these passages, we can state that the Holy Spirit is meant in the Letter to the Hebrews to be, first of all, a gift. Therefore it is the Holy Spirit who makes the preachers of the Gospel (2,4) to be particular gifted to do it. Christians participate in Him (6,4). He exhorts and speaks to man (3,7b; 9,8), is the Spirit testifying that man has received salvation (10,15), is the One who leads the faithful to the Divine throne of grace (10,29). Only once is the Holy spirit shown as the One who led Jesus in the work of the offering of the cross (9,14).Pozycja Galilejskie pochodzenie synoptycznego źródła QPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2002)Galilean towns, like Capernaum, Bethsaida and Chorazin, mentioned in Q suggest a Galilean origin of the document. Other places mentioned there, both the ones that actually existed then (Tyre, Sidon, Jerusalem), and ones existing only in the imagination of people of those times who knew the Old Testament (Sodom, Nineveh) are mention from the perspective of one who is situated centrally with respect to them. This speaks for Galilee as the place where the writers of Q were staying. Numerous images and metaphors from agricultural, rural life, but also from urban life, confirm this opinion. A positive image of the nature suggests urbanisation of Galilee in not a distant time. According to the author of the article the document could be written on the area between Tiberias and Nazareth.Pozycja Gatunek literacki wczesnochrześcijańskiego dokumentu QPaciorek, Antoni (Wydział Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 2002)Pozycja J. Chmiel: Lumière et charité d’après la première épître de S. Jean, Rome 1971, ss. XLVIII+267.Paciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1974)Pozycja Jeszcze o autorstwie IV EwangeliiPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Basing himself, implicitly or explicitly, on the findings of diachronic and synchronic studies on the author of the Fourth Gospel, the author presents his own opinion about the authorship of this Gospel. He believes that it is John, the son of Zebedee, on of the Twelve Apostles. The work of John the Apostle is continued by John's collaborator, one of the most prominent personalities of John's community, namely John the Presbyter. It is in his surrounding, in Ephesus, that the proper edition of the Fourth Gospel was completed. And it is there that John the Apostle, the father of church community, which came from Syria to Asia Minor, was called “the disciple whom Jesus loved” The last editor, after the death of John the Presbyter, in face of the dangers threatening the Church in Asia, intended to bind it closely with the authority of the "beloved disciple”, that is John son of Zebedee. He did it through his final remarks on the writing of the Gospel. From that time, that is from the time of the last edition the belief that John the Apostle was its author has paved its victorious way through ages. At the time the main editor of the Fourth Gospel, i.e. John the Presbyter, has fallen into oblivion.Pozycja „Jezus Chrystus wczoraj i dziś, ten sam także na wieki” (Hbr 13, 8)Paciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1998)The author is dealing with the profession of faith in Hbr 13, 8. In the first part he shows the way contemporary exegesis approaches the understanding of this text. This way can be reduced to an answer to the following question: what did the formulation from Hbr 13, 8 mean for the author at that time? The second part presents the standpoint held by the exegetes of the ancient Church. It turns out that the ancient church commentators lay down the problem differently. For they ask: what do the words (Hbr 13, 8) mean for a Christian in general? What do they mean especially for the Christian today, when he confronts the ideas of Arianism, Nestorianism, and others not so well defined erroneous views? Origen, for instance, perceives in the formulation a confirmation of the very popular in those days views held by the philosophy of history about particular epochs in the history of salvation. It is in Hbr 13, 8 that Athanasy saw the knowledge about the invariability of the Word in the mystery of the Incarnation. The Greek Fathers (St. Gregory Nazianzen) read out the formulation as a concise reminder of the unity of the divine and human attributes in Jesus Christ. Now the argument with Nestor brought to mind Hbr 13, 8 as the text about the unity of two natures: divine and human in one person of the Word (Cyril of Alexandria). In the third part the author attempts to notice what hints there are for contemporary exegesis from the manner in which it was pursued by the great teachers of the ancient Church.Pozycja Kościół lokalny w nauczaniu starożytnych pisarzy chrześcijańskichPaciorek, Antoni (Instytut Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 1987)Pozycja Mt 16, 17-19 przedredakcyjną jednostką literackąPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1973)Pozycja Nowa modlitwa uczniów Nowego Przymierza (Mt 6,9-13)Paciorek, Antoni (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2003)Pozycja Poganie „przed Chrystusem” według „Listu do Rzymian” 1-2Paciorek, Antoni (Instytut Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 1994)Pozycja Potrójne kuszenie Jezusa w opisie pierwszego Ewangelisty (Mt 4,1-11)Paciorek, Antoni (Wydział Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 2004)Pozycja Psałterz w Mateuszowym opisie męki JezusaPaciorek, Antoni (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2009)The author focuses on the quotations from the psalms that we find in the description of Jesus’ Passion in the Gospel of St. Mathew. It turns out that almost all the quotations from the psalms (with the exception of 26, 64: Ps 109, 1 LXX) stress the human nature of Jesus, i.e. they are anthropologically oriented. The author discusses each of the seven quotations in the context of the psalm, and then in the context of Jesus’ Passion. Following partly the Gospel of St. Mark, St. Mathew enhances in the reader a belief that Jesus in His Passion is the Suffering Just and the suffering poor Jehovah.Pozycja Skarb w glinianym naczyniu (2Kor 4,7-15)Paciorek, Antoni; Szmajdziński, Mariusz (Częstochowskie Wydawnictwo Archidiecezjalne „Regina Poloniae”, 2015)Using the image of the treasure in the earthen vessel, Apostle Paul explains the Corinthians’ nature of his Ministry. The weakness of the Messenger does not disqualify his message, but rather it is a sign of the divine origin of the messages. This does not mean, of course, that God’s power can manifest itself only in human weakness. On the contrary, there is the link between the human experience of suffering and theological interpretation (experience of suffering as the image of the death and resurrection of Jesus). This is what the Apostle sees as the dark side of his use, participation in the fate of Jesus. The aim is that the community also took part in the glorified life of Jesus. The grace that God wants to give to both Paul and the Corinthian community is that they work towards the fulfilment and improvement of their current lives.Pozycja Św. Augustyn egzegetaPaciorek, Antoni (Instytut Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 1993)Pozycja „Syn Boży” i „Syn Człowieczy” w chrystologii źródła QPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2001)The title “Son of God” appears in Q only in the pericope about the tempting of Christ (Luke 4,1-13). Jesus only and exclusive relation to the Father is a significant point of confrontation between Jesus and his opponent. Contrary to Israel carried across the desert like the Son by his Father (Deut 1, 31; 8, 5) and again and again succumbing to temptations, Jesus proves to be a true “Son of God” behaving according to God's orders; the only Obedient one. The title “Son” in Q (Luke 10, 21) finds its roots in the wisdom circle. Pronouncements about the Father, typical of Jesus, have affected the understanding of Sonship in the sense of mutual cognition and in consequence in the sense of revelation. After discussing the ideological context of the phrase “Son of Man” the author analyses Jesus' pronouncements concerning the Son of Man. They point to the Son of Man acting on Earth and to the Son of Man appearing at he judgement. The article is concluded with a review of opinions about the historical authenticity of the discussed statements. Acceptance of the substantial authenticity of the statements concerning the Son of Man seems justified, although the influence of a Christian hand is not ruled out.Pozycja Troska o zmarłych w modlitwach i obrzędach starożytnych GrekówPaciorek, Antoni (Instytut Teologiczny w Tarnowie, 1981)