Przeglądaj wg Autor "Piekarska, Magdalena"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3

Chrystologia sztuką życia Dietricha Bonhoeffera
Ferdek, Bogdan; Piekarska, Magdalena (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2012)
Bonhoeffer’s resistance to Nazism flies in the face of the initial successes of the Third Reich. Believing that truth consists of more than the facts, he chose to resist evil rather than negotiate a „non-agression pact” with it. For Bonhoeffer truth is not so much something as it is Someone, i.e. Jesus Christ. Living in the truth thus entails following Jesus. Today the debate over truth has taken a new face. A thoroughgoing relativism, which denies the existence of truth and hence of lies, acknowledges one’s self and one’s desires to be the only measure of things. The fruit of relativism is political correctness, which eliminates certain themes from public discourse in the name of tolerance. The dominant ideology gains control of the media and perhaps the parliament, leading to solutions that infringe on the dignity of human beings. Bonhoffer reminds us that politicians cannot divorce themselves from truth.
Modlitwa osobista jako droga do przebóstwienia w ujęciu metropolity Kallistosa Ware’a
Piekarska, Magdalena (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2012)
This paper shows personal prayer as a way to theosis formulated by Kallistos Ware. It is also an attempt to show the role of a body in a prayer. Orthodox Church, being strongly influenced by Fathers Tradition, teaches that hesychia is a state of peace for a person who prays short formula ‘Jesus Christ, the Son of God, have mercy on me’. The prayer that is of a mouth at first, becomes through a prayer of intellect to a prayer of a heart, that is a constant being in front of God. Prayer of a heart makes a man the prayer. Becoming a prayer assumes participation of a body. Jesus revealed His divinity in the body. Hesychia is then a prayer of a holy person and has its result in unification. A person who does not sleep but prays through the light of Tabor makes his nature better. Theosis is final unification.
„Nowy” człowiek Bonhoeffera i nadczłowiek Nietzschego – próba porównania elementów dwóch antropologii
Piekarska, Magdalena (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2011)
The subject of the paper is Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s philosophy of a man, in particular, its connections with Friedrich Nietzsche’s antropology. The author sows Bonhoeffer’s philosophy based on the truth from the Bible and Nietzsche’s philosophy based on rejection of the God. The author compares he most important points of Bonhoeffer’s and Nietzsche’s antropology to show resemblances and differences. Philosophy of overman which was put into practise in Bonhoeffer’s life ruined a dignity of a man. „New” man was overman’s resist.