Przeglądaj wg Autor "Stepulak, Marian Zdzisław"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 18 z 18
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Ks. Marek Chmielewski, Recepta na świętość?, Edycja Świętego Pawła, Częstochowa 2005 (Biblioteka Dnia Pańskiego, 51), ss. 80.Stepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2006)Pozycja Postawy psychologów w rozwiązywaniu podstawowych problemów moralnych i zawodowychStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Every psychologist who undertakes a variety of tasks, always has to assume different attitudes towards the moral and occupational problems that he or she will have to cope with. Thus we can distinguish between many attitude pairs which are completely opposite in their meanings. For instance, the alarmist and balanced attitude, poli-pragmatic and adequate attitude, demonstrable and discrete attitude, nihilistic and realistic-optimistic attitude, over-involved and empatie attitude, conceited and humbling attitude. The importance of moral education for a psychologist results from every human imperfection. Hence, the onus is on a psychologist to learn about the ethics and develop knowledge in the field of morality. It can be concluded that a psychologists must be a tutor of his or her own. According to a research, which I performed among 311 psychologists, the most problematic moral and occupational issue for them was to maintain a professional secrecy. The most significant attitude is assumed by those psychologists who are commissioned to do a certain research. Therefore, in this context we can distinguish between the following types of attitudes: evaluative, interpretative, nourishing, in vestig ative and understandable.Pozycja Relacyjność systemu rodzinnegoStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2007)In the article two variables deserve special attention: relation and family system. With respect to the issue of relation such key terms as reaction, interaction, and relation in the aspect of its definition and basic typology have been undertaken. Communication is another element of the analysis of relation. In this context the problem of definition and interpersonal communication is presented. Part two of the article refers to the problem of the family as a system of interpersonal relations. First the systemic approach in psychology is presented. The approach was created by L. von Bertalanffy, who defined the concept of “system” as a complicated structural arrangement made up by mutually connected components. Among the fundamental values of the system the following ones may be differentiated: the inner indivisible and complete integrity of the system (cohesion of the system), organization, progressive segregation (mechanization), centralization, structuralization and a hierarchical order, steering and nonsteering as well as stiff and non-stiff properties, equifinality, allometry of metabolic, morphogenetic phenomena and growth of the system, dynamism, variability and evolution as well as orientation towards development. Also in this context an analysis of the family system has been made.Pozycja Rodzina w świetle psychologii pastoralnej, red. Borys Jacek Soiński OFM, Łódź: Archidiecezjalne Wydawnictwo Łódzkie 2007, ss. 269.Stepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Rola ojca w rodzinie w świetle badań maturzystów z diecezji siedleckiejStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2010)The problems of fatherhood have become today a matter of interest for many learned areas and disciplines. The role of meaning of the father in a family system is also one of the basic aspects of the studies on the family. This publication if an evidence of that interest. It consists of two principal parts: theoretical and empirical. The theoretical part discusses the problems of the biblical and theological understanding of fatherhood as well as the contemporary issues of fatherhood. The second part presents a strategy of research and an quantitative analysis of the findings. The studies use the method of psychological questionnaire. Their goal was to examine the role of the father in a family system. Particular questions dealt with the following issues: religiousness that secondary school graduates declared, interpersonal relations with fathers, assessment of the father’s personality (positive and negative), an image of the ideal father, father’s participation in the process of upbringing, father’s influence on his children’s religious formation, father-mother relationship, children’s respect towards their father, and an image of the father inherited in childhood. The whole of the study has been crowned with a summary, conclusions, and bibliography. It is worth adding that the studies provided a complete answer to the questions in the questionnaire. They showed an image of the father in the contemporary Polish family according to secondary school leavers. The studies’ value resides also in this that they covered a very numerous group (867 persons).Pozycja Sprawozdanie z I konferencji naukowej „Stan badań na temat aktywności zawodowej osób niepełnosprawnych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem obszarów wiejskich”. Biała Podlaska, 27-28 lutego 2009 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2009)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z I Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Naukowej „Co dzieje się z wartościami? Próba diagnozy”. Bydgoszcz, 5-6 listopada 2008 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2009)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z II Międzynarodowej Konferencji naukowo-szkoleniowej „Zdrowa szkoła – zdrowy uczeń ”. Między teorią a praktyką zorganizowanej przez Instytut Pedagogiki, Zakład pedeutologii i edukacji zdrowotnej, Uniwersytetu Marii-Curie Skłodowskiej. Lublin, 18-19 maja 2010 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2011)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z Konferencji Międzynarodowej pt. „Kościół – Rodzina – Życie” zorganizowanej przez Instytut Studiów nad Rodziną UKSW. Łomianki, 7-8 maja 2010 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2011)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z międzynarodowej konferencji naukowej „Dimenzie a perspektívy rozvoja osobnosti jedinca v súčasnej škole” („Kierunki i perspektywy rozwoju osobowości jednostki we współczesnej szkole”). Inštitút Juraja Páleša v Levoči, 15-16 kwietnia 2009 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2010)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z Międzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowej „Zdrowa szkoła – zdrowy uczeń”. Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej i Wyższa Szkoła Społeczno-Przyrodnicza w Lublinie. Lublin, 6-7 listopada 2007 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z V Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Naukowej „Mistyka jako stan świadomości i typ doświadczenia religijnego jednostki ludzkiej”. Poznań, 25-26 lutego 2009 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2009)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z VII Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Naukowej na temat „Kościół instytucjonalny a rodzina. Problem relacji i więzi wzajemnych”. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Poznań, 29-30 listopada 2006 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z VIII Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Naukowej na temat „Moralność współczesnego społeczeństwa polskiego: zagrożenia i rzeczywistość”. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Poznań, 28-29 listopada 2007 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z XI Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji „Etyka w życiu gospodarczym – problemy etyczne środowiska akademickiego”. Salezjańska Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii i Zarządzania w Łodzi. Łódź, 10-11 maja 2007 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2008)Pozycja Sprawozdanie z XX polsko-niemieckiego sympozjum „Wśród swoich…”. Potrzeby chorych psychicznie i odpowiedzialność lokalnej społeczności. XX. Deutsch–Polnisches Symposium „Psychisch Krank – und Nun?”. Die Bedürfnisse des Psychisch Kranken und die Verantwortung der Gemeinde. Lublin, 1-4 października 2009 rokuStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2010)Pozycja Strategie radzenia sobie ze stresem u współmałżonków w sytuacji migracji zarobkowejStepulak, Marian Zdzisław; Pabian, Katarzyna (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2011)Stephen Castles and Mark Miller have defined contemporary times as the age of migration. Similarly, in Poland labor migration that was intensified after Poland had joined the European Union, is a phenomenon forming numerous social processes. Poles’ migrations share the general tendencies: globalization, acceleration, diversification and feminization. They have many consequences for marital and family life. One of them, that is the cause why other consequences occur, is stress. The present article tackles the issue of strategies of coping with stress used by the spouse of a labor migrant, who remains at home. The article consists of two parts. In Part One the specific character is presented of labor migrations after Poland had joined the European Union. The results brought by migration are sketched on the family and social planes. The effect of separation caused by economic factors on the marital bond and on the family life is emphasized. Among the many consequences also stress is mentioned, that is characterized from the angle of the migration process, starting from the decision about the trip, through successive “visits of the migrant at home”, to the consequences of the long absence in the relations with the wife/husband and with the children. The significance is emphasized of the choice of certain strategies of coping in the situation of a series of stressing events started by migration. In view of the fact that the problem had not been made the object of academic considerations before, research was conducted that aimed at describing the way that the selected traits in the spouses of labor migrants influence the choice of strategies and particular ways of coping. Hypotheses and research questions were formulated, taking into consideration such variables as sex, education, length of marriage, and the connection of these variables with the strategies of coping with stress. In order to verify the hypotheses and to answer the questions two research tools were used: a demographic questionnaire and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire by Richard S. Lazarus and Susan Folkman. Part Two of the article contains a description of the methodology of the authors’ own research, as well as an analysis and interpretation of the obtained results. On the basis of the demographic questionnaire the population of the spouses of labor migrants who remain at home was characterized, as well as the difficulties that the subjects consider troublesome in the situation of separation caused by economic factors. In the summing up of the article the conclusions are included that may be a basis for planning family-marital counseling in the situation of labor migration.Pozycja Tajemnica zawodowa w pracy psychologa rodzinnegoStepulak, Marian Zdzisław (Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 2009)The article discusses the problem of the doctor-patient privilege in the work of the family psychologist. A considerable number of psychological studies, also ones conducted by the author of the present article, clearly indicate that confidentiality is the most often occurring problem in the psychologist’s professional work, as well as the one that is the most difficult to solve. It seems that for a psychologist, especially a family psychologist, not only constant work on raising professional qualifications, but work on formation of one’s own moral level is important. In the first part the very concept of secrecy is subjected to an academic reflection; first in the aspect of the definition, and then with respect to the range and specificity of the privilege. The second part of the article is concerned with the doctor-patient privilege of the family psychologist in two aspects. The first one is defining and presenting the fundamental properties of the family system, and the second one is analysis of the specificity of the work of the family psychologist in the context of the doctor-patient privilege.