Przeglądaj wg Autor "Swend, Daniel"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 5 z 5
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Andrzeja Nowickiego krytyka języka religijnegoSwend, Daniel (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1992)Andrzej Nowicki, a Marxist philosopher, has created an unconventional way of understanding atheism. In his view its content is not designated by the Greek ethymology of that word. Atheism, according to him, is not merely a negation of the transcendental reality, but most of all an afirmation of values hidden under the mistified form of the religious language. He carries out the principal criticism of religion, aside to the well-known forms (a ciriticism of the essence, genesis and function of religion), by proving a nonsensical character of the religious language. He claims that religious concepts have no real designates, as they are commonly thought to have. It is rather the designate-creating and personifying consciousness of man that makes use of a particular way of speaking to create the designates of the religious language. They are in fact humanistic, rationalistic and materialistic values under the disguise of a mistified „shell” of the religious language. The reson why Nowicki's analyses are inapt comes from that that he disregards the nature of the language in general, its basic distinctions as well as the questions of verifiableness of the language. Apart from that, is it possible to study the value of the religious language and its semantic field, if one a priori negates the existence of whatever forms of the extramaterial reality?Pozycja Chrystocentryczny wymiar wiary w ujęciu Hansa WaldenfelsaSwend, Daniel (Uniwersytet Opolski. Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego, 2002)Pozycja Chrześcijaństwo jutra. II Międzynarodowy Kongres Teologii Fundamentalnej w LublinieSwend, Daniel (Wydawnictwo Diecezji Zielonogórsko-Gorzowskiej, 2002)Pozycja Hansa Waldenfelsa koncepcja teologii fundamentalnej kontekstualnejSwend, Daniel (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2004)The German Jesuit Hans Waldenfels is considered to be the originator of the conception of fundamental contextual theology that he sees as a borderland discipline. He compares it to standing at the threshold of a house, as “the perspective of the threshold” allows ‒ in his opinion ‒ to assess properly what is going on inside the house, that is in Christianity, in the Church, as well as outside it. The threshold of a house should be the place where Christians (mainly Catholics) meet representatives of other religions and non-believers, and listening to the voices coming from both sides should become the basis for formulating an objective opinion. The perspective of borderland gives fundamental theology a tool for efficient communicating the Christian Revelation, which in the context of the modern world is made difficult by opposition (atheism, divisions inside Christianity, salutary offers from other religions), improper understanding (different horizons in the sender and the recipient of the message of the Gospel) and not overlooking Christ’s message (because of subjective disturbances in the speaking and listening subjects). The postulated efficiency of the promise of salvation “in the context” requires ‒ in the Bonn theologian’s opinion ‒ undertaking definite tasks, that is theological reflection in the apologetic, hermeneutic and dialogical aspects.Pozycja Hansa Waldenfelsa soteryczny wymiar wiarySwend, Daniel (Wydawnictwo Diecezji Zielonogórsko-Gorzowskiej, 2002)