Przeglądaj wg Autor "Tupikowski, Jerzy"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 15 z 15
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Anthropology of the evangelical counsels in the school of St. Benedict of NursiaTupikowski, Jerzy (The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Cracow, 2018)Man is someone real and as such he is immersed in a world that is a task set to him as a person. Therefore, the whole world, as entirely coming from God, and entirely assigned to Him, is constantly bursting with its natural truth and good and, consequently, also beauty. This is an important perspective, both in the order of nature and in the order of grace, also because the synthesis and fulfilment of all values (perfections), which is personal fullness – holiness, is the ultimate reference of the human person to the Person of God. However, this perspective becomes comprehensible only in the field of the realism of the human person’s truth, goodness and beauty, related to their perfect Source, and therefore to the Truth, Goodness and Beauty of the Person of God Himself. In this sense, it can be said that God is the End of all perfections. Holiness itself is thus a specific peak of the elevation of human potentialities to a higher level of being. „Holiness, through the elevation of truth, goodness and beauty to the supernatural level, can fulfil the potential of human nature – reason and will, to their limits; and this fulfilment, in Christian thought, can only take place in visio beatifica, to which this life here and now is supposed to prepare us”. Let us add that the understanding and implementation of evangelical counsels: chastity, poverty and obedience, serve this growth in a particular way. The counsels are the evangelical factor stimulating and strengthening the work of the intellect and free will.Pozycja Istnienie i ewolucja. Przyczynek do dyskusji w świetle metafizyki egzystencjalnejTupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2008)Pozycja Jacek Wojtysiak, Dlaczego istnieje raczej coś niż nic? Analiza problemu w kontekście dyskusji we współczesnej filozofii analitycznej, TN KUL, Lublin 2008, ss. 479.Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2009)Pozycja Józef Bremer, Josef Rothhaupt (red.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: „przydzielony do Krakowa” – „Krakau zugeteilt”, Wyższa Szkoła Filozoficzno-Pedagogiczna „Ignatianum” – Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2009, ss. 590.Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2010)Pozycja Kapłan – świadek miłości Boga do człowieka, J. Kiciński (red.), Wrocław 2010, ss. 232Tupikowski, Jerzy (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II, 2011)Pozycja Kartezjańskie cogito jako istotny faktor epistemologii J.L. BalmèsaTupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2013)Pozycja Krytyczna rekonstrukcja głównych założeń analitycznej teologii naturalnej J. HickaTupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2015)A synthetic depiction of John Hick’s philosophical reflections proves that in his research the religion-oriented theodicy issues come to the fore. The natural theology, or rather the philosophy of religion, proposed by him aims at (1) questioning the conclusivity of any attempts at supporting arguments for the existence of God (the cosmological or the ontological arguments). He claims that the measures taken in those arguments by no means stand up any logical criticism. On the other hand (2), John Hick puts forward an original proposal of an argument named as “eschatological verification”. This way of constructing arguments particularly appeals to him as he is immune to allegations against the inconsequence of metaphysical conclusions. He bases it on the intuition of logical consistency, though on the horizon of the very religious faith. Therefore, the “eschatological verification” formulated by the author of The fifth dimension and his highly controversial theory of “religious relativistic pluralism” boils down to an a priori quasi-religious concept of the world, a concept that cannot be subjected to any rational (logical) verification. His proposal only results from the projected coherence of religious experience.Pozycja Ks. Mirosław Kiwka, ABC filozofii, Wrocław 2001, ss. 161Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2001)Pozycja Marian Grabowski, Pomazaniec. Przyczynek do chrystologii filozoficznej, „W Drodze”, Poznań 2010, ss. 268Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2012)Pozycja Metafizyczna „natura” bytu matematycznego. Uwagi wstępneTupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2010)The fundamental goal of the analysis underlined in present article was initial presentation of the metaphysical conclusions relating to the being and the content of the mathematical being. Outlined conception of understanding of that being allows to draw two fundamental conclusions. First of all, the mathematical being finds its ground it in context of the role and of the realistic presentation specification of the concrete, real being with metaphysical equipment. The essential accent is the realism of existence of that being. Afterwards the mathematical being, as the effect of abstraction, shows itself as peripheral understanding of the concrete being, appearing its quantity aspect. This nature of the mathematical being exposes itself and exploits simultaneously it’s essence-understanding in the quantitative (mathematical) interpretation of the world. That interpretation is the important dimension specification of reality, which realizes varied types of features, elements, categories, where the quantitative structure constitutes the fundamental factor, which enables it’s realistic understanding.Pozycja „Nieszczęsny dar” ateizmu. Szkic do perspektywy dialogu – wyzwania i trudnościTupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2013)This article explores the complexity of the phenomenon of atheism in the horizon of human freedom. Starting from as it seems the right diagnosis of the problem presented by Rev. Prof. J. Tischner, the paper shows a prospect of the dialogue at the crossroads of fundamental contemporary religious and ideological choices and attitudes. They are represented, as it is expressed by L. Kołakowski, by the three leading “protagonists”: “the mystic”, “the skeptic” and “the nihilist”. The dialogue between reason and faith conducted in the field of skeptic’s sharp arguments and in the light of testimony given by the mystic, though difficult, is possible. In fact, religious faith demands “a speech about God”, while doubt, provided it is an authentic pursuit, namely a search for truth, is actually an initial opening up to God being the Truth.Pozycja Review: J. Merecki SDS, Osoba i dobro. Szkice o teologii i filozofii osoby Karola Wojtyły – Jana Pawła II (Person and Good. Sketches on the Theology and Philosophy of Person According to Karol Wojtyła), John Paul II Institute, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2019, pp. 264Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2020)Pozycja Sławomir Zatwardnicki, Ateizm urojony. Chrześcijańska odpowiedź na negację Boga, Kraków 2013, ss. 228.Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2013)Pozycja Tadeusz Szubka, Filozofia analityczna. Koncepcje, metody, ograniczenia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2009, ss. 258Tupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2011)Pozycja Transcendencja Boga wobec świata. Studium metafizyki św. Tomasza z Akwinu i Alfreda N. WhiteheadaTupikowski, Jerzy (Papieski Fakultet Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, 2000)