Teologia w Polsce, 2016, Tom 10, Nr 2
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/35576
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Teologia w Polsce, 2016, Tom 10, Nr 2 wg Temat "Benedykt XVI"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Acedia, neognoza, popreligia et consortes. Josepha Ratzingera/Benedykta XVI teologiczne diagnozy kryzysów współczesnościSzymik, Jerzy (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2016)The shape of anthropology depends on the shape of theology. Godless anthropology distorts the image of a man; a broken relationship with God makes all spheres of life and human activity become distorted and degraded. While rejecting his Creator and the dependence on Him, a man loses his sense of meaning and taste of life. He neurotically tries to find them in other areas, replacing real values with substitutes and true reality with independently created requisites. Ratzinger shows that the loss of God and misplaced human autonomy generate sorrow, emptiness and, consequently, protest; everything in life becomes ill. According to J. Ratzinger/ Benedict XVI, the most dangerous contemporary diseases of culture and spirituality are: neo-gnostic mentality which is a mixture of anthropological frustration, blind faith in science and snobbery of elites; trendy fascinations with the West versions of Far Eastern religions generally supporting nihilistic inclinations of postmodernity; narcissistically creative culture and relativistic output placed beyond good and evil ‒ in the name of tolerance and pluralism. The only cure can be cognition of real God and recognition of a source of hope and love in Him. Only by drawing from Him, a man is able to co-create the world where the final word does not belong to death.Pozycja Hermeneutyka reformy – hermeneutyka wiaryZatwardnicki, Sławomir (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2016)The article focuses on the issue of proper interpretation of the Second Vatican Council’s inheritance. Benedict XVI believes a “hermeneutic of reform” is an alternative to a “hermeneutic of rupture”. Nevertheless, the expected “hermeneutic of reform” has received different interpretations. That’s why a relevant hermeneutic of the “hermeneutic of reform” must be applied. The author presumes that an issue of the Bible interpretation, which is in accord with the postulated by Benedict XVI “hermeneutic of faith”, is a practical expression of applying the “hermeneutic of reform”. Therefore, the „hermeneutic of reform” has been interpreted in the light of the “hermeneutic of faith”.Pozycja Rainer Hangler, Juble, Tochter Zion. Zur Mariologie von Joseph Ratzinger/Benedikt XVI, Verlag Friedrich Pustet, Regensburg 2016, ss. 335.Wojtczak, Adam (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2016)