Roczniki Teologiczne, 2003, T. 50, z. 1
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/10383
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczne, 2003, T. 50, z. 1 wg Temat "Bible"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 10 z 10
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Arcykapłan Nowego Przymierza – ukrzyżowany i zmartwychwstały Chrystus (Hbr 1, 5-2, 18)Witczyk, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)The author analyzes the transformation of the most ancient Christian tradition, the transformation described in the Letter to the Hebrews. It consists in the fact that the death and resurrection of Jesus are a consecration of the High Pries of the New Covenant. The crucified and resurrected Christ is an anti-type of the High Priest of the Old Covenant. A High Priest is a Mediator and Leader who may not only show the way to the House of the Father. As the only-begotten Son of God He has the right to usher others into it (cf. J 14, 6-9). Through His passion and death Jesus had been transformed and became the perfect High Priest. Thus ’’made perfect” (Heb 2, 10), that is, crucified and resurrected Jesus, was made the Head of people and their Leader to salvation. In other words, God made Him the High Priest. The passion and death of Jesus were in fact an exceptional and unique kind of consecrating the High Priest of the New Covenant.Pozycja Kronika Instytutu Nauk Biblijnych KUL za rok akad. 2001/2002Kiejza, Andrzej (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)Pozycja List do Filipian a Pawłowe więzienie w EfezieRakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)The author seeks to verify the hypothesis that Paul wrote the Letter to the Philippians in Ephesus. First he proves that the apostle was there a prisoner, then that the traditional view, the Roman hypothesis, poses some difficulties. The author analyzes the circumstances in Phil, pertaining to Paul, and checks any possible cases (ie sites) in which they could have taken place. Only in the case of Ephesus that the circumstances from Phil can be confirmed by other sources. The author presents some reasons in favour of Ephesus. At the same time he proves that even though there is no mention in Phil about the money raised on behalf of the poor in Jerusalem, and Paul’s collaborators are absent, the Ephesus’ hypothesis can still be defended. These facts even speak in favour of it. The author situates Paul’s prison in Ephesus. The Phil was written during the summer of the last but one year of the apostle’s sojourn in this town. It was several months before the Letter to the Corinthians was written in the autumn of the same year.Pozycja Od kerygmatu Jezusa do kerygmatu Kościoła w Ewangelii według św. MarkaKotecki, Dariusz (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)Pozycja Polska bibliografia biblijna za lata 1998-2000Szier-Kramarek, Barbara (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)Pozycja Skała Izraela w świetle wiersza Pwt 32, 30Szwarc, Urszula (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)The author concentrates on the meaning of verse Deut 32,30, especially the statement "their Rock sold them” Her philological-exegetic-theological analysis of the verse and the verses Deut 32,35a. 36a-b allows us to assume that the sentence in question hides an essential salvational truth. It teaches us that God does not stop being a sure footing for His chosen, even then when – as we say it – He punishes them. On the contrary, He is then their rock, more than in other circumstances. He is therefore Someone on Whom one can always and anytime rely, in Whom one may totally confide. By punishing people, He at the same time appears as the One Who raises from the fall, and change human life for better, transform failure into victory.Pozycja Stan badań nad Księgą KapłańskąTronina, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)Starting from a very important commentary made by Karl Eiliger (1966) and the first anthropological work by Mary Douglas, published in the same, the author seeks to show the development of studies on this little known Book of the Bible. The four parts of the paper embrace a broad panorama of scientific research on the Book of Leviticus. In the first part the author discusses the most important commentaries, especially those written in German and English. Then he summarizes the state of literary research on the mutual relationship of both sources Lev (P – Priestly Source and H – Code of Holiness). And then he discusses the more recent proposals of the literary composition of the Book, pointing to its concentric structure. Finally, he reviews anthropological and strictly theological studies, giving examples of some selected subjects from the Book.Pozycja Teologia biblijna Starego Testamentu wczoraj i dziśRubinkiewicz, Ryszard (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)The paper is a synthetic presentation of the process of creating “biblical theology” as a separate scientific discipline, together with its goal and research methods. He also discusses current problems within the biblical theology of the Old Testament, especially those connected with the biblical canon of the Old Testament and the relationship between the Old and the New Testaments.Pozycja William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles (WBC 46), Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers 2000, ss. CXXXVI + 641 (z indeksami).Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)Pozycja Żydowskie święto Pięćdziesiątnicy w perspektywie św. Łukasza (Dz 2, 1-41)Mielcarek, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2003)There seem to be a little awareness among contemporary Christians of Jewish feasts and their sense in the time of Jesus Christ. This lack is a rather important one, since the New Testament writers wrote their texts having full knowledge about important Jewish customs and convictions. Lucan way of picturing the day of outpouring the Holy Spirit on the Church is a good example of it. Thus the article gives a number of possible connotations for Jewish Pentecost developed in the time of Jesus and subsequently refers various contemporary interpretations of Acts 2. The final stage of the paper is an attempt to juxtapose both groups in in order to show possible common ground for Jewish liturgical-theological sense of Pentecost and its Lucan counterpart. Such juxtaposing of material might help to discover Luke's genuine motives hidden behind his narrative of Pentecost in Acts 2.