The Biblical Annals, 2022, T. 12, nr 3

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23877

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj The Biblical Annals, 2022, T. 12, nr 3 wg Temat "anthropology"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Homosexuality in the Pontifical Biblical Commission Document What Is Man?
    Healy, Mary (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2022)
    Considerable public attention has been given to the treatment of homosexuality in the recent document of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, What Is Man? A Journey through Biblical Anthropology. Some reports have claimed that the document represents a shift in Catholic teaching toward the accept ance of homosexual acts. This article assesses that claim by carefully examining the relevant sections of the document in the perspective of its wider reflections on biblical anthropology and on the biblical vision of the institution of marriage. While the document situates the biblical texts concerning homosexuality within their literary and cultural contexts and emphasises the pastoral sensitivity with which this topic must be approached, it does not promote a revision or reversal of the Church’s teaching on sexual morality.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
    Martos, Levente Balazs (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2022)
    The 2019 PBC document views relationships between parents and children, masters and servants, “shepherds” and “the flock,” civil authority and citizens as asymmetric. The structure of the doc ument suggests that these relationship systems are based on shared human experience and a common the ological foundation: they appear to repeat the pattern of the parent-child relationship and originate in the obligation to obey God. Using the document as a starting point, I would like to outline what the con cept of asymmetric relationships can mean today. In search of common perspectives, I will compare New Testament texts with the interpretation of asymmetry in today’s social ethics discourse. The inequality and asymmetry of different persons and groups seem to be an undeniable fact, causing tension that can be resolved fruitfully by parties who take responsibility for each other in the presence of a “third.”