Roczniki Teologiczne, 2004, T. 51, z. 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/10951

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczne, 2004, T. 51, z. 1 wg Temat "Acts of the Apostles"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Stefan Szymik MSF, Problem polemiki antyepikurejskiej w pismach Nowego Testamentu, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2003, ss. 413.
    Poniży, Bogdan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2004)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    „Tak samo czynili prorokom ich ojcowie” (Łk 6, 23). Odrzucenie proroków w Trzeciej Ewangelii w perspektywie błogosławieństw
    Mielcarek, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2004)
    Jesus’ beatitudes in the third Gospel form a literary unity with woes directed to those, who do not experience hardships in this world. The closing phrase in both sections is almost identical and it has to do with the prophets. Lk 6, 23b closes the first section persuading readers that contrary to all false prophets, all the prophets sent by God did experience persecutions and hatred. The paper approaches the issue posing a question in what way such a phrase could possibly encourage Christians to live according to Jesus’ beatitudes. After a short sketch of traditions about prophets derived by Luke from Q (I), some specifically Lukan texts are dealt with (II). Finally, the answer is proposed: It is necessary to accept God’s grace in the midst of difficulties experienced by all humans, for the alternative is too tragic to be chosen. Those who reject Jesus and His beatitudes in order to avoid hardships in their earthly existence will have to share the future of false prophets (Lk 13, 28).
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Tytus krewnym Łukasza?
    Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2004)
    The author verifies Ramsay and Souter’s suggestion – put forward more than a hundred years ago – that Luke and Titus, Paul’s collaborators, were brothers. They came to this conclusion because there is no mention of Titus in the Acts. To verify the proposition the author conducts a study of Titus’ historical position in Paul’s mission and then of his significance as compared to that of the apostle’s other associates in the Acts. The conclusion may be reached that making no mention of Titus in the Acts is not accidental. The only reason for this that can be justified is the same one that made Luke, the author of the Acts, pass in silence over his own person. On this basis we find that the reason of not mentioning Titus is in the same relation to the work as to its author, that is in the close relation between Paul’s two collaborators. Ramsay and Souter’s specific suggestion that Titus was Luke’s brother does not find confirmation, but it points to the direction in which to look for a solution to the problem, that is to a certain relationship between them.