Scripta Biblica et Orientalia, 2009, T. 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/6732

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Scripta Biblica et Orientalia, 2009, T. 1 wg Temat "ancient Near East"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Pochodzenie i natura starotestamentalnego kultu Molocha
    Piwowar, Andrzej (Wydawnictwo KUL, 2009)
    The article is dedicated to the Old Testament cult of Moloch. The author concentrated on two principle problems of the researched issue, these are the origin and nature of this cult. The most important attempts to interpret the Biblical Moloch were presented in a critical way: the classical, Rabbinic, the relationship of sacrifice existing between the law concerning the first born and the cult of Moloch, and next the views of contemporary researchers concerning Moloch and his cult: Eissfeldt, Weinfeld and an attempt to grasp Moloch as a chthonic deity. After analyzing the results of the above mentioned research, it ought to be stated that today we are not able to in an unequivocal way reply to the question about the origin and nature of the Biblical Moloch, because we have too little data, Biblical as well as extra-Biblical (archeological and literature) which would allow us to give a certain and univocal reply. The Biblical Moloch continues to be a mystery for contemporary Biblists and the history of religion.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Początki monarchii hebrajskiej
    Münnich, Maciej (Wydawnictwo KUL, 2009)
    The Biblical tradition devoted to the beginnings of the Hebrew monarchy consists of no less than three stories. The first, anti-monarchical story (1 Sam 8; 1 Sam 10:17-27; 1 Sam 12), has surely no historical value, as written many centuries after the Saul’s reign, and full of later theocratic theological concepts. The second, promonarchical story (1 Sam 9:1–10:7.9-12; 1 Sam 13:2–14:46) appears to be very old, however its propaganda character is clear. It severely limits the credibility of the text. The third story about Saul fighting against Ammonites (1 Sam 11) seems to describe the real events, and its credibility can not be denied. On that basis it is possible to conclude that the minimalists’ thesis excluding the existence of Saul’s monarchy, as well as the traditionalists’ thesis fully accepting the historicity of the Biblical traditions, should be rejected.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Zapiski króla Ezechiasza: Iz 38,9-20 na tle ugaryckich tekstów królewskich
    Toboła, Łukasz (Wydawnictwo KUL, 2009)
    This paper presents the discussion on the philological and literary problems connected with authorship of the text Isa 38:9-20, which is attributed to Hezekiah, the king of Judah. The Masoretic text of Isa 38:9-20 contains many problematic readings, including a probable errors in not reflecting an archaic grammar, hapax legomenon words, misused idioms and confused letters. The accumulation of curiosities is unusually high in these twelve verses. I consider the diffi cult readings in the MT as pointing to the work of a semiliterate rather than a learned scribe whose words became confused in transmission. There is some evidence that the ancient Near Eastern kings have been able to write and even compose poetic texts. The Psalm of Hezekiah can be compared with the Ugaritic prayer to Baal (KTU 1.119), which was probably composed by the one of the Ugaritic kings. In such a context, it is quite possible, that Hezekiah created the original version of Isa 38:10-20 by himself and in his own hand (compare, the Qumranic tradition, preserved in 1QIsaa).