Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1988, T. 35, z. 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/11788

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1988, T. 35, z. 1 wg Temat "biblical exegesis"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Problematyka literacko-historyczna Łk 4, 16-30
    Mielcarek, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1988)
    The article analyzes the literary aspect of the Nazareth percicope (Lk 4,16-30). It is shown against the background of the Third Gospel as a whole and of its more im mediate context, the narrative in Lk. 3,21-4,44. The interdependencies between the pericopes reveal the main theological motifs of the passage. The unity of the narrative of Lk. 3,21-4,44, the typically Lucan vocabulary of the Nazareth pericope and an editorial style matching that of the author of the Third Gospel all point to Luke as the main author of the passage. Whole the Nazareth episode is constructionally dependent on Mark (Mk. 1,14f.; 6,1-6) and on the Q source, Luke also drew on traditions not used by the other Synoptics. Besides, his own contribution to the final form of the pericope is so large that the question of tradition is a secondary one. The Evangelist's primary motive was to give a theological interpretation of the events in Nazareth. The structure of the passage is very carefully thought out and composed so as to form three units that bring out the content of the verses 18f. and 21f. The three elements call to mind the tripartite structure of the whole Gospel of Luke. They are: (1) preparation in the form of a chiasmus (vv. 16-20), (2) revelation as the central part (vv. 21-22), and (3) mission – twofold comparison with the tragic outcome of Jesus' visit to Nazareth (vv. 23-30). The fact that Lk. 4,16-30 was composed in accordance with Hellenic literary canons suggests that we should interpret it, alongside the Capernaum episode, as an exemplary account of Jesus' messianic activity as a prophet and a healer.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Rzeczy "dawne" i rzeczy "nowe" w wypowiedziach Deuteroizajasza
    Stachowiak, Lech (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1988)
    Yahweh's creative power, and the saving action which is closely linked with it, are among His most characteristic attributes. For Deutero-Isaiah, God manifests His creative power in history and in His saving action. "Old" things denote the history of salvation so far, while "new" things denote a new exodus from slavery. The theme of "old" and "new" things plays an especially important part in the following texts: Is. 41, 22-23; 42, 9; 43, 9. 18-19; 46, 9-10; 48, 3-6. In their exegetic analysis particular attention is paid to the motif of "old" and "new" things. The above texts show that history does not unfold in a random fashion, but is the realization of the prior word of Yahweh. God's guidance lends things special unity. In this way He, "the first" and "the last” (Is. 41, 4), proclaims the beginning and the end, makes a promise and fulfils it, proving His godhead. He was conscious of His intentions from the beginning and was able to carry them out in full.