Studia Ełckie, 2016, T. 18, nr 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23701

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Studia Ełckie, 2016, T. 18, nr 1 wg Temat "Bible"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Biblijne podstawy dogmatu Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny w wybranej polskiej literaturze teologicznej do 1965 roku
    Węsierski, Krzysztof (Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum, 2016)
    In the article, the issue of the Biblical bases of Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary was concerned. The text was based on Polish theological literature published until 1965. When analysing the Bible one can notice that it does not mention directly the fact of Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Nevertheless, the discussed theologians deal with this matter by referring to Tradition.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Lilit – między mitem a Biblią
    Janik, Marek (Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum, 2016)
    In Jewish folklore, from ,,Alphabet of Ben Sira” onwards, Lilith becomes Adamʼs first wife, who was created at the same time as Adam. The idea in the text that Adam had a wife prior to Eve may have developed from an interpretation of the Book of Genesis and its dual creation accounts, while Genesis 2:22 describes God's creation of Eve from Adamʼs rib, an earlier passage, 1:27, already indicates that a woman had been made. Whereas there are five references to Lilith in the Babylonian Talmud. According to Talmud Adam lived a hundred and thirty years and begot a son in own likeness, after his own image, from which it follows that until that time he did not beget after his own image. The only occurrence is in the Book of Isaiah 34, 14, describing the desolation of Edom, where the Hebrew word לִילִית appears in a list of eight unclean animals, some of which may have demonic associations. Since the word לִילִית is a hapax legomenon in the Hebrew Bible. As it seems that Lilith was a demon of the night which would coincide with the possible references to the ,,lilītu” in Babylonian demonology. However, this view is challenged by some modern research such as by J.M. Blair who considers that the context indicates animals.