Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1980, T. 27, z. 2

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/10173

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczno-Kanoniczne, 1980, T. 27, z. 2 wg Temat "Christianity"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Historyczność człowieka w ujęciu personalistycznym
    Bartnik, Czesław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1980)
    The author tries to define the structure of man’s historicity and its particular elements. The basic elements of this historicity are for him: the possibility to became a person, the dimension of existence as an act of realization and secondary acts, as well as the mixture of passiveness and activeness. The secondary elements are: the rootedness in the world of beings, use of time and space as the basis, and the final limitations of man. History is possible mainly owing to the transitiveness of all the spheres inslide the personal being. The same applies to the social history, which is history in a more proper sense. Generally, historicity is defined as the whole process of a man becoming a person, owing to the dimension of existence, through the fulfilment of oneself in self-realization with the positive vector.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Stanisław C. Napiórkowski OFM Conv. Solus Christus. Zbawcze pośrednictwo według ,,Księgi Zgody”. Lublin 1978. Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski ss. 230
    Bartnik, Czesław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1980)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Znaczenie patrystycznej idei przebóstwienia dla soteriologii chrześcijańskiej
    Hryniewicz, Wacław (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1980)
    The article deals with the idea of theosis, i.e. deificaltion, which in the writings of the Greek Fathers plays an important soteriological rale. Its true significance, however, has been very often misunderstood, especially by Western interpreters. Following the line of recent patristic studies in this area, the author tries to justify his conviction that Christian soteniology, integrally understood, has to take into account the two poles of the salvific work of Christ, both the Incarnation and the Paschal Mystery. There are no two distinct soteriologies with the Church Fathers, one based on the Incarnation (so-called physical theory of redemption, divinisation of human nature as a whole), another on the redemptive deeds of Christ, esp. on His suffering and death. The Greek Fathers did not advance any conception of theosis of mankind, based exclusively on the Incarnation. Their insistence on the theandric reality of Christ has to be understood in the context of early christological controversies in the Church. The Fathers had bo defend the theandrism of the Incarnation for soteriological reasons. This view of the Incarnation may seem to us today too theoretical and too abstract. One has to remember, however, that it was kept in a real balance by the paschal spirituality of the early Church. Therefore the Greek Fathers understood the Incarnation dynamically as a reality, which aims at its fulfilment in Christ’s death and resurrection. According to this, the theosis of man must not be unilaterally related to the Incarnation. Neither the Incarnation nor the death and resurrection constitute an autonomous reality of redemption. These two poles form but one undivided mystery of human salvation, i.e. theosis, whose beginning is the Incarnation, and fulfilment the blessed Passover. Christis Paschal Mystery is nothing else than the mystery of the Incarnation in its full accomplishment. Consequently the theosis has also to be understood in its full dimension. It has its final basis in the Incarnation, but takes its effect, by the power of the Holy Spirit, only after Christ’s glorification.