Sztuczne zapłodnienie w probówce dobrem. Dla kogo?

dc.contributor.authorKatolo, Artur J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T13:32:05Z
dc.date.available2025-06-23T13:32:05Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.descriptionAutor streszczenia: Magdalena Motyl.
dc.description.abstractThe author of this article deals with the practical aspects of the artificial insemination. Artificial fertilization techniques, FIVET in particular, create the gap between procreation and the conjugal act. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith claims that dignity of the human being demands that a child should not be the final product of the more or less advanced biomedical techniques. If the child is a technological product and not the fruit of the act of the spouses’ union then the child is deprived of the equal personal dignity towards parents and doctors. As a product, the child must fulfill parents’ needs. The child in this context is a plan to be pursued, which can be controlled and verified. Sad and numerous cases prove that the child conceived with FIVET was rejected after having been diagnosed to be ill or handicapped. These are the consequences of the production logic, which forms the basis for depriving the conceived child of the right to be accepted as a human person. The child is perceived as the product which aims at satisfying parents’ expectations. It is the technocratic authority imposed by adults who bring down themselves to the level of being gamete or biological material providers.
dc.identifier.citationResovia Sacra, 2002-2003, Tom 9-10, s. 107-115.
dc.identifier.issn1234-8880
dc.identifier.urihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/32744
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherInstytut Teologiczno-Pastoralny im. św. bpa Józefa Sebastiana Pelczara w Rzeszowie
dc.rightsCC-BY-SA - Uznanie autorstwa - Na tych samych warunkach
dc.subjectzapłonienie in vitro
dc.subjectin vitro
dc.subjectsztuczne zapłodnienie
dc.subjectbioetyka
dc.subjectmedycyna
dc.subjectprokreacja
dc.subjectrewolucja społeczno-prokreacyjna
dc.subjectrewolucja społeczna
dc.subjectspołeczeństwo
dc.subjectrewolucja prokreacyjna
dc.subjectżycie ludzkie
dc.subjectmetoda FIVET
dc.subjectteologia
dc.subjectteologia moralna
dc.subjectetyka
dc.subjectgodność
dc.subjectgodność ludzka
dc.subjectczłowiek
dc.subjectpoczęcie
dc.subjectosoba ludzka
dc.subjectin vitro fertilization
dc.subjectartificial insemination
dc.subjectbioethics
dc.subjectmedicine
dc.subjectprocreation
dc.subjectsocio-procreative revolution
dc.subjectsocial revolution
dc.subjectsociety
dc.subjectprocreative revolution
dc.subjecthuman life
dc.subjectFIVET method
dc.subjecttheology
dc.subjectmoral theology
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectdignity
dc.subjecthuman dignity
dc.subjecthuman being
dc.subjectconception
dc.subjecthuman person
dc.titleSztuczne zapłodnienie w probówce dobrem. Dla kogo?
dc.title.alternativeArtificial insemination is good but for who?
dc.typeArticle

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Miniatura
Nazwa:
Katolo_Sztuczne_zaplodnienie.pdf
Rozmiar:
253.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format