Problemy teorii dwóch źródeł na przykładzie perykopy o największym przykazaniu (Mk 12, 28-34; par. Mt 22, 34-40; Łk 10, 25-28)

Abstract

On the example of the pericope about the greatest commandment (Mark 12, 28-34; Matt 22, 34-40; Luke 10, 25-28) the author tries to elucidate the “minor agreements” between the Gospels according to St Matthew and St Mark as opposed to St Mark and draw the consequences of this fact for the two sources hypothesis (Mark and Q). According to the author, simply repeating the hypothesis of two sources is a great mistake; on the contrary, existence should be accepted of the so-called deutero-Mark who re-wrote the text of St Mark’s Gospel in the changed historical situation after the year 70. This text by deutero-Mark was next used by Matt / Luke and is responsible for the presence of the so-called “minor agreements” between these two Gospels.