Antropologia autonomiczna a antropologia teonomiczna: próba syntezy

dc.contributor.authorGuzowski, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T10:20:46Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T10:20:46Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.descriptionSummary translated by / Autor tłumaczenia streszczenia: Jan Kłos.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThis paper brings close the human hermeneutic horizons of autonomous man and theonomous man, i.e. those approaches that result from the experience of transcendence or its lack. In its conception of man, Christianity takes Incarnation as its starting point. In the light of Incarnation, transcendence and immanence are mixed in the life and Person of Jesus Christ. Christianity is not an ideology, but it stresses the historical and personal experience of God- Man whose Person and life compose the foundation on which to understand the whole of reality. It is on this view that our perception of ethics depends. Ethics is different if this point is disregarded. However, ethics should always have primacy over politics. In order to cherish an overall human scope, ethics should be based on integral anthropology that respects all dimensions of the person: individual, social, spiritual, religious, the internal and external aspects. Contemporary personalism emphasises all the essential traits of the person, among which we find transcendence, freedom, relational and dialogical character. The person is fulfilled in relations because it is a relationship with regard to his or her essence. Christian ethics that is built on the foundation of personalistic anthropology recognises the dimension of human transcendence, especially in relation to persons and values. It does not reject, however, a different point of view, but at the same time disagrees to any discrimination of its position in the world of human values. A patient and concrete dialogue, such that aims at the good of every human being is the foundation of scientific ecumenism. This integral model of reality open to the dignity of each person and his social dimension is given by personalism. Only in the perspective of the person can we build a level of understanding and this should be a universal principle.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipKatolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła IIpl_PL
dc.identifier.citationRoczniki Teologii Dogmatycznej, 2010, T. 2(57), s. 77-93.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2080-6345
dc.identifier.urihttp://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/9641
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherTowarzystwo Naukowe KULpl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectantropologiapl_PL
dc.subjectantropologia autonomicznapl_PL
dc.subjectantropologia teonomicznapl_PL
dc.subjectantropologia liberalnapl_PL
dc.subjectalienacjapl_PL
dc.subjectegzystencjalizmpl_PL
dc.subjectegzystencjalizm ateistycznypl_PL
dc.subjectdoświadczenie Bogapl_PL
dc.subjectdoświadczenie charyzmatycznepl_PL
dc.subjectautonomiapl_PL
dc.subjectfilozofia religiipl_PL
dc.subjectteologiapl_PL
dc.subjectanthropologypl_PL
dc.subjectautonomic anthropologypl_PL
dc.subjecttheonomous anthropologypl_PL
dc.subjectliberal anthropologypl_PL
dc.subjectalienationpl_PL
dc.subjectexistentialismpl_PL
dc.subjectatheistic existentialismpl_PL
dc.subjectexperience of Godpl_PL
dc.subjectcharismatic experiencepl_PL
dc.subjectautonomypl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophy of religionpl_PL
dc.subjecttheologypl_PL
dc.subjectfilozofiapl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophypl_PL
dc.titleAntropologia autonomiczna a antropologia teonomiczna: próba syntezypl_PL
dc.title.alternativeAutonomous Anthropology Versus Theonomous Anthropology: The Attempt at a Synthesispl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Miniatura
Nazwa:
Guzowski_Antropologia_autonomiczna_a_antropologia_teonomiczna.pdf
Rozmiar:
141.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Opis: