O Leszka Kołakowskiego interpretacji religii

dc.contributor.authorBoużyk, Małgorzata
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T14:19:03Z
dc.date.available2024-01-15T14:19:03Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.descriptionTłumaczenie streszczenia Jan Kłos.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe paper attempts at an all-embracing characteristic of L. Kołakowski’s interpretation of religion which religion he takes as a socially accepted cult of eternal reality. Thus comprehended religion should be, according to Kołakowski, clearly distinguished from science in its rationalistic and functional meaning, when science is meant to be a tool of subjecting the world to man. Religion then is a non-rational way of taming reality which is being realized not within the domain of science but myth. Myth involves the whole man, making the sense of his life relative to mythical reality; it demands total faith and acceptance of its requirements, and does not allow for any attempt of their rational justification. However, according to Kołakowski, one can find the presence of myth in any human activity, including the typically rational. Among various forms of myth, religion plays a particularly important and positive role, since it expresses the deepest human need of the existing someone who, while transcending the mundane dimensions, would make the world senseful, and at the same time would be a support for man and a living partner of the dialogue of love. In this manner Kołakowski criticizes any attempts at a rational justification of the existence of God (esp. the “five ways” of St. Thomas) and His attributes. He accepts, however, the postulate of God which postulate is “justified” by the mythic structure of human consciousness. Thus comprehended religion is an essential element of culture and it protects culture against the danger of secularization. Kołakowski’s interpretation of religion emerges from his basic philosophical option. Its element is, among others, a narrow, quasi-scientistic understanding of reality which understanding does not allow Kołakowski to “place” within its framework the philosophy in general and the philosophy of God in particular. Hence his interpretation of religion is burdened with the Kantian agnosticism and Marxian functionalism.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipKatolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła IIpl_PL
dc.identifier.citationRoczniki Filozoficzne, 1989-1990, T. 37-38, z. 2, s. 85-117.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0035-7685
dc.identifier.urihttp://theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/12408
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherTowarzystwo Naukowe KULpl_PL
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectreligiapl_PL
dc.subjectreligionen
dc.subjectfilozofiapl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophyen
dc.subjectfilozofia religiipl_PL
dc.subjectphilosophy of religionen
dc.subjectinterpretacjapl_PL
dc.subjectinterpretationen
dc.subjectLeszek Kołakowskipl_PL
dc.subjectnaukapl_PL
dc.subjectscienceen
dc.subjectpoznaniepl_PL
dc.subjectcognitionen
dc.subjectgranice poznaniapl_PL
dc.subjectlimits of cognitionen
dc.subjectmitpl_PL
dc.subjectmythen
dc.subjectBógpl_PL
dc.subjectGoden
dc.subjectkulturapl_PL
dc.subjectcultureen
dc.titleO Leszka Kołakowskiego interpretacji religiipl_PL
dc.title.alternativeOn Leszek Kołakowski’s Interpretation of Religionpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Miniatura
Nazwa:
Bouzyk_O_Leszka_Kolakowskiego_interpretacji_religii.pdf
Rozmiar:
177.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Opis: