Czy Pan Jezus zniósł prawo odwetu?
Ładowanie...
Data
2013
Autorzy
Tytuł czasopisma
ISSN czasopisma
Tytuł tomu
Wydawca
Wydział Teologiczny Uniwersytetu Opolskiego
Abstrakt
It is often claimed, especially in popular Bible commentaries, that the principle “eye for eye” had constituted the ius talionis observed by Jews, which Jesus Christ has nullified. In the article, the effort was undertaken to understand what kind of law this principle really represented in Judaism, with references to rabbinic literature both found in Qumran and in use today. In that context, the Jewish commandment “not to revenge” was analysed, too. It was pointed also that the function of a “goel” (called “the revenger of blood” in KJV) is often confused with the revenge which is really not the case. It is the matter of fact, however, that if Jesus nullify the law on “goel” it would make His own mission of redemption baseless. So, keeping in mind His attitude to Torah, we should understand that Jesus Christ wasn’t able to nullify any law of Old Testament, and He didn’t mean it.
Opis
Słowa kluczowe
prawo odwetu, mściciel krwi, zemsta, Jezus Chrystus, Stary Testament, Nowy Testament, Biblia, Pismo Święte, biblistyka, egzegeza, egzegeza biblijna, teologia, teologia biblijna, odwet, rękopisy z Qumran, rękopisy, manuskrypty, Qumran, zwoje znad Morza Czarnego, Tora, zemsta w Torze, Pięcioksiąg, right of retaliation, revenger of blood, avenge, Jesus Christ, Old Testament, New Testament, Bible, biblical studies, exegesis, biblical exegesis, theology, biblical theology, retaliation, manuscripts from Qumran, manuscripts, Dead Sea Scrolls, Torah, retaliation in the Torah, Pentateuch
Cytowanie
Scriptura Sacra, 2013, R. 17, s. 47-58.
Kolekcje
Licencja
CC-BY-NC-SA - Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Na tych samych warunkach