Myśl personalistyczna w rosyjskiej filozofii religijnej

Ładowanie...
Miniatura

Data

2010

Tytuł czasopisma

ISSN czasopisma

Tytuł tomu

Wydawca

Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL

Abstrakt

The idea of personalism is present in the pre-Soviet Russian philosophical and theological thought. There were eminent philosophers who played meaningful roles in its development. The question about the relationship between God and man was important for them, and it is from this perspective that they treated man’s relationship to the whole reality created by God, and the interpersonal relationship. The most important question here remained the problem of man himself, who he is, what his place is among other beings, what tasks there are for him, and where he tends. In this knowledge of his own and the world’s reality the human person was a separate mystery. In his considerations each Russian thinker presented his own vision of the human person, creating thereby the Russian personalistic direction, or even the Russian school of personalism. The following thinkers played a great role here: Berdiaev, Shestov, Karsavin, Losski, and others.

Opis

Summary translated by / Autor tłumaczenia streszczenia: Jan Kłos.

Słowa kluczowe

personalizm, Rosja, personalizm rosyjski, personalizm Bierdiajewa, personalizm Szestowa, personalizm Łosskiego, personalizm Karsawina, osoba symfoniczna, osoba, Nikołaj Bierdiajew, Lew Szestow, Nikołaj Łosski, Lew Karsawin, filozofowie, filozofia, filozofia rosyjska, filozofia religii, personalizm paradoksalny, personalizm wolności absolutnej, personalizm hierarchiczny, personalism, Russia, Russian personalism, Berdyaev’s personalism, Shestov’s personalism, Lossky’s personalism, Karsavin’s personalism, symphonic person, person, Nikolai Berdyaev, Lev Shestov, Nikolay Lossky, Lev Karsavin, philosophers, philosophy, Russian philosophy, philosophy of religion, paradoxical personalism, personalism of absolute freedom, hierarchical personalism, rosyjska filozofia religijna, Russian religious philosophy

Cytowanie

Roczniki Teologii Dogmatycznej, 2010, T. 2(57), s. 157-171.

Licencja

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland