Koncepcja osoby ludzkiej w filozofii św. Tomasza z Akwinu

dc.contributor.authorCichosz, Wojciech
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T14:29:35Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T14:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractWhile reading an extensive literature on the topic of a person and personality one can notice that unequivocal reading and understanding of the above mentioned notions is not entirely possible. The word person, which comes from the Greek prosopon (προσοπον) and Latin persona, has an ample history and meaning. The case is similar with words such as personality and personalism, which originate from it. Nevertheless, one thing is certain - everything took its beginning in the ancient Greek culture. At first the Greek word prosopon signified a mask used by an actor on the stage while playing the role of mythical hero or gods. As the time went by this term was used to signify the actor himself. Christian religion was a powerful impulse in the process of crystalisation of the meaning of the word person. It should be remembered that in the Bible God is a person. The Hebrew word phaneh should be translated as: the figure, or countenance expressing the whole human individual or God himself. Usually the way Boethius formulated this notion is treated as elementary: persona est naturae rationalis individua subtantia (a person is an individual substance of rational naturę). The conception of a person suggested by Saint Thomas is characterised by the following features: • the notion of the person consists of autonomy, reasoning and individual existence; • this notion also includes wholeness, therefore separately existing human soul is not a person; • the name of the person indicates inseparability or individuality of entity existing in any nature; • a person signifies a concrete man, and this stands for uniqueness and exclusivity; • a person is something far more than an individualised nature; • not every individual entity is a person, although it is included in the generic notion of substance, but this refers only to an entity that exists by itself (per se); • a person also signifies independence from any whole. A human person cannot be reduced to any worldly value, as man consists of both body and soul, which is spiritual, non-materialistic and timeless; • only a man can be called a person because he is the only singular entity (singulare) characterised by thinking nature that exists in natural world. Saint Thomas preserves the substantialistic theory of human person while referring back to both Aristotle and Boethius. Nevertheless, he sees the ontological condition of a person in a different element than Boethius. He assumes that the condition of the reality of the substance is the act of existence. Such attitude is a typically existential formulation and it is based on ascribing real existence to something only then if a given substance was originated by the act of existence.
dc.description.sponsorshipGdańskie Seminarium Duchowne
dc.identifier.citationStudia Gdańskie, 2000, T. 13, s. 175-186.
dc.identifier.urihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/26492
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherKuria Metropolitalna Gdańska
dc.rightsCC-BY-ND - Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych
dc.subjectczłowiek
dc.subjectosoba
dc.subjectosoba ludzka
dc.subjectfilozofia
dc.subjectTomasz z Akwinu
dc.subjectświęci
dc.subjectdoktorzy Kościoła
dc.subjectcompositum humanum
dc.subjectantropologia
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectperson
dc.subjecthuman person
dc.subjectphilosophy
dc.subjectThomas Aquinas
dc.subjectsaints
dc.subjectDoctors of the Church
dc.subjectanthropology
dc.titleKoncepcja osoby ludzkiej w filozofii św. Tomasza z Akwinu
dc.typeArticle

Pliki

Oryginalne pliki

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 1 z 1
Miniatura
Nazwa:
Cichosz_Koncepcja_osoby_ludzkiej_w_filozofii_sw_Tomasza_z_Akwinu.pdf
Rozmiar:
194.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format