Studia Oecumenica
Stały URI zbioruhttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/29825
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Studia Oecumenica wg Autor "Chojnacki, Grzegorz"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 4 z 4
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja „Ein gutes Leben führen“. Die Rezeption der Enzyklika Laudato si‘ vom Papst Franziskus im deutschen ökumenischen DialogChojnacki, Grzegorz (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2015)The reception of Pope’s Francis’ encyclical Laudato si’ in German ecumenical dialogue indicates the great interest of the Catholic Church and the Protestant Church in Germany in environmental issues. The two most important bodies that represent these Churches, i.e. Deutsche Bischofskonferenz (DBK) and Evangelische Kirche Deutschland (EKD), see the importance of the Pope’s document published in 2015 when major conferences and summits being important for environmental and climate protection took place with the participation of the highest representatives of different states and international organisations. This document calls for consideration of the natural environment of men taking into account integral ecology in the light of which the creation of man and animate and inanimate world by God in accordance with His eternal plan means a gradation of the relationships of individual creatures to Him. This gradation does not legitimise any degradation or tyrannisation of the natural environment by man. This gradation also raises the desideratum saying that in this time of concern for the preservation of Earth as our common home there is no room for extreme biocentrism which may lead to the loss of human ecology.Pozycja Polityka i etyka – razem czy osobno? Ponadkonfesyjny projekt etyki globalnejChojnacki, Grzegorz (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2012)The question put forward in the title of the article is to be answered positively. Ethics and politics must go hand in hand, even though the revealed nuances show that the common path is not easy. However, without ethics the politics changes into an instrument for expedience, sometimes into socio-technical regulation of their conflicts or technocratic crisis management. Without the metaphysical-anthropological foundation the politics turns into „the house built upon the sand” as the construction of the house of state is not based on the clear human vision. The ethical responsibility of the human being and thus the clear concept of the lawful state and its institutions are the premises for both politicians and the state agencies to treat the common good as the supreme value. The formulated question about the relationship between ethics and politics generates the successive question about the kind of ethics. As the understanding of the moral law, whether in unity with law given by God or only purely human, depends on it. The attempts to specify the minimal global ethos (Weltethos) in a supra-confessional or interreligious dimension built on the autonomous morality (autonome Moral) create numerous objections caused by the unsatisfactory acceptance of a divine order. Nevertheless the very dialogue on constructing the world of politics based on values is indispensable especially in the era of disseminating the anti-values.Pozycja Problem relacji międzywyznaniowych w rozumieniu katolickiej pedagogiki Edyty SteinChojnacki, Grzegorz (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2007)Pozycja Problem zaniechania sztucznego przedłużania życia we współczesnym niemieckim dyskursie ekumenicznymChojnacki, Grzegorz (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2013)In the ecumenical discussion taking place in Germany on life in the terminal phase the unanimity in the main postulates referring to the enabling the dignity of death is to be noticed. The Catholic Church and the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD) approve the possibility of setting up “living wills” (Patientenverfügung) which should refer to the wish to withhold the artificial life extension in specific circumstances and which cannot make the request for a direct euthanasia neither through active deprivation of life nor through withholding the application of the proportional means of therapy. The “living will” should constitute the act of human freedom not determined by any unacceptable premises or conditions as the conditions of acceptance to the nursing home or residential medical care facility.