Przeglądaj wg Autor "Muszytowska, Dorota"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 9 z 9

Cel Listu Judy (Jud 3-4) w perspektywie epistolografii i retoryki
Muszytowska, Dorota; Chrostowski, Waldemar; Kowalski, Marcin (Stowarzyszenie Biblistów Polskich, 2021)
Dramat ojcowskiej miłości (Łk 15,11-32)
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2013)
The parable of the father and his two sons in the Gospel of Luke (Luke 15:11-32) makes part of a series of parables depicting the attitude of God toward sinful man. It is the attitude of seeking, concern, love, and joy in the presence of which nobody, even the greatest sinner, is excluded. The present article focuses on that attitude by exposing relationshis between father and his two sons. Despite the fact that the narrative presents the events from the perspective of the sons, the father can be considered the main character of the parable. The story of the sons shows the drama of father’s love which was rejected and misunderstood by them. Both sons lose their dignity by denying their father’s love, but only the younger seems to realize it. The father shows both of them the same love and assures them that in his eyes they have never lost their sonship and they have never been deprived of it. Each of the children has to be re-adopted; each in his own way indicated by the father. The younger has to accept paternal forgiveness which is full of mercy and joy prompted by his return. The elder, on the other hand, has to imitate the mercy and joy offered by the father to his younger son.
Kwestia homoseksualizmu w Listach Powszechnych i w Apokalipsie św. Jana
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2021)
W dyskusji nad tematyką homoseksualności i biblijnego nauczania w tej kwestii przywoływane są teksty z Listu św. Judy 7 i Drugiego Listu św. Piotra 2,6 oraz Apokalipsy św. Jana 22,15. Ze względu na to, że żaden z tych tekstów nie podejmuje bezpośrednio zagadnień związanych z moralną oceną homoseksualności, zarzuca się często, że są one nadinterpretowane i wykorzystywane w nieuzasadniony sposób w nauczaniu. W niniejszym opracowaniu skoncentrowano się na analizie tych fragmentów, ukazując ich funkcje w argumentacji, w jakiej zostały użyte, ich siłę perswazyjną i teologiczny sens, po to, aby zweryfikować zasadność powoływania się na te teksty w dyskusjach nad homoseksualizmem i jego oceną. Szczegółowe analizy pozwalają postawić wniosek, że żaden z tych utworów nie porusza bezpośrednio tematyki homoseksualizmu. Nie jest także oczywiste, że historycznym i retorycznym kontekstem tych wypowiedzi było podejmowanie przez chrześcijan aktywności homoseksualnej. Dla autorów owych trzech pism kwestia ta nie była istotą ich nauczania. Wszystkie jednak analizowane fragmenty dotyczą, w różnym stopniu, sfery ludzkiej seksualności. Wszelkie akty i zachowania seksualne, które nie są zgodne z wolą Boga, są jednoznacznie negatywnie ocenione i ukazywane jako konsekwencje zaprzeczania autorytetowi władzy Jezusa Chrystusa, prowadzące do bezbożności, oraz jako jako przyczyny utraty łaski zbawienia.
Metaphtonymy of ἀστέρες πλανῆται in the Epistle of Jude 13 in the Light of the First Book of Enoch
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2024)
This article aims to elucidate the precise meaning of the expression ἀστέρες πλανῆται in the Epistle of Jude 13. The expression occurs within aseries of metonymies (Jude 12–13) used by the author of the epistle to depict the wicked (ἀσεβεῖς) who are under critique. Commentators highlight the challenge of interpreting the expressions appearing in those passages due to their metaphorical nature and the vagueness of their contextual origins. The metaphtonymy of ἀστέρες πλανῆται has been examined considering how metaphtonymy is defined in cognitive linguistics. Firstly, the sense resulting from the use of substitution (metonymy) was analysed. Attention was then given to the possible metaphorical meanings of the metonymy. Particular focus was given to the mechanisms of metaphor production, as the expression bears the characteristics of both a general metaphor, derived from experience, and acontextual metaphor, produced for aspecific discourse. To characterise the domain of the expression within a given discourse, the Epistle of Jude was analysed as the primary context. Additionally, the First Book of Enoch (1 Enoch) was examined as a potential intertext that could reveal the mechanism of figurative language production in the expression ἀστέρες πλανῆται, as well as its meaning. The starting point was the assumption that there is a dependency relationship between Jude and the 1 Enoch. An analysis of the extant sources (Greek-language versions of 1 Enoch) has led to the conclusion that it is not possible to demonstrate hypoand hypertextual relationships for the expression ἀστέρες πλανῆται due to the lack of material evidence. An analysis of the meanings of the constituent expressions included in the metaphtonymy in question, as well as of the contexts in 1 Enoch, allows the conclusion that the authors of both texts and probably also the presumed primary recipients of the Epistle of Jude have asimilar way of thinking and speaking. 1 Enoch makes it possible to better define both the use of this expression by the author of Epistle of Jude and understand the mechanism of figurative language production significantly influenced by the context of apocalyptic ideology.
„Owoc sprawiedliwości jest zasiewany w pokoju przez czyniących pokój” (Jk 3,18). Socjoretoryczna analiza koncepcji pokoju w Liście Jakuba
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2016)
Przedmiotem niniejszego artykułu jest pouczenie dotyczące pokoju z Listu Jakuba 3,18 Rozpatrywane jest ono w świetle zasad socjoretoryki. W pierwszej części zostaje przeanalizowana wewnętrzna tekstura gnomy z 3,18: najpierw jej syntaksa i możliwości interpretacji z niej wynikające, a następnie lokacja gnomy w argumentacji retorycznej Listu i jej semantyka wynikająca z poszerzenia o kontekst wypowiedzi. W drugiej części artykułu zostaje przeanalizowana intertekstura tej gnomy: najpierw związki z innymi tekstami, a następnie echa koncepcji pokoju charakterystycznych dla żydowskiej kultury odzwierciedlającej się tekstach Starego Testamentu oraz kultury greckiej i rzymskiej.
The Meaning of the Motif of Michael the Archangel’s Dispute with the Devil (Jude 9). A Socio-Rhetorical Perspective
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2020)
The purpose of this article is to analyse the persuasive functions of the Archangel Michael motif in the Epistle of Jude 9, and examine how the laconic reference serves argumentation in the letter and how it affects the recipients. We used methods of interpretation from the field of socio-rhetoric according to the interpretation model developed by Vernon K. Robbins, adapted to the needs of this study: rhetorical analysis, intertextual relations, and analysis of the pivotal values of the first-century Mediterranean world. The analyses lead to the conclusion that the condensed form of the reference to the Archangel Michael motif makes it possible to refer to the crisis among the addressees on many levels at the same time. It serves positive argumentation based on the ethos, uses the strength of the rich interpretative tradition of the motif and proves to be the key to the proper implementation of the answer within the challenge-riposte mechanism and to defining the threat to the communal identity.
Wychowanie do mądrości – dydaktyczna perswazja w Jk 3,13-18
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2012)
The Letter of James is a didactic piece of writing. Its genre of parenetic letter or protreptic discourse and abundant usage of diatribe indicate that the author wants to show his readers the proper attitude to Christian life. James’ appeal is based on double-track argumentation: what is good and profitable vs. what is bad and unprofitable. Into this reasoning is inserted the argumentation of Jas 3,13-18, focused on appealing to Christian fellows to live their lives wisely. James distinguishes between worldly wisdom and God’s wisdom, and urges Christians to live according to the latter because it bears good fruits in the life of the community, such as justice, peace, concord, truth, gentleness. On the other hand, earthly wisdom, which he calls demonic, results in opposing negative values that can be noticed in social life. These are attitudes like quarrel, discord, envy, boastfulness, negation of truth. The conclusion that has to be deduced by the reader is evident – only the life guided by God’s wisdom is worth living.
Wykluczenie ze wspólnoty wierzących w świetle 1 Kor 5,5
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2010)
The analysis of the controversial formula of exclusion from the community of believers that we find in 1 Cor 5,5 leads above all to the conclusion that this recommendation can be treated as a rule of how a community should act in these kind of situation. Paul alludes to the real case of an incestuous relation of a member of the Church in Corinth. This behavior is judged as being harmful not only to those who are engaged in it but bas a social dimension as wen and injures the whole community of believers that is no longer credible. Consequently, the community that is not credible is not able to give witness to Jesus Christ. The rhetorical perspective prompts us to broaden this single recommendation on all the cases of overt evil in the community. The status of the act is evident. What Paul is trying to correct is the luck of any reaction of the community on the evil that spreads in it. The Apostle recommends the community to formally exclude the guilty person. It is to be seen as a firm objection against evil and it is motivated by the care for the spiritual well being of both parts. The community should hope that the sinner change his attitude and thus will obtain salvation when the day of the Lord comes.
Żona zbawiająca męża (1 Kor 7,16)?
Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2011)
The question "How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband?" (1 Cor 7:16) closes the so called ‘Paul's marriage privileges’ running in the preceding verses of 1 Cor 7. The issue expressed with a question mark refers to mixed marriages. The present essay aims to explore this already much harvested text from a new exegetical perspective. In the first part, the socio-religious context of the audience in the 1 Corinthians is exposed: the background of their beliefs and dilemmas concerning marriage. In the second part, the issues of the married women position in Judaism and in the Greco-Roman culture of the period are explored. The last step of the investigation is the analysis (mainly rhetorical) of Paul's argumentation in 1 Cor 7:16 in the context of 1 Cor 7:12-16. The final conclusion is that a Christian wife (as well as a Christian husband) cannot save her spouse because, according to Paul's argumentation in the passage, the responsibility for believers' salvation belongs solely to Christ. Nevertheless, a Christian wife can sanctify her husband.