Przeglądaj wg Autor "Muszytowska, Dorota"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 4 z 4
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Cel Listu Judy (Jud 3-4) w perspektywie epistolografii i retorykiMuszytowska, Dorota; Chrostowski, Waldemar; Kowalski, Marcin (Stowarzyszenie Biblistów Polskich, 2021)Pozycja The Meaning of the Motif of Michael the Archangel’s Dispute with the Devil (Jude 9). A Socio-Rhetorical PerspectiveMuszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2020)The purpose of this article is to analyse the persuasive functions of the Archangel Michael motif in the Epistle of Jude 9, and examine how the laconic reference serves argumentation in the letter and how it affects the recipients. We used methods of interpretation from the field of socio-rhetoric according to the interpretation model developed by Vernon K. Robbins, adapted to the needs of this study: rhetorical analysis, intertextual relations, and analysis of the pivotal values of the first-century Mediterranean world. The analyses lead to the conclusion that the condensed form of the reference to the Archangel Michael motif makes it possible to refer to the crisis among the addressees on many levels at the same time. It serves positive argumentation based on the ethos, uses the strength of the rich interpretative tradition of the motif and proves to be the key to the proper implementation of the answer within the challenge-riposte mechanism and to defining the threat to the communal identity.Pozycja Wykluczenie ze wspólnoty wierzących w świetle 1 Kor 5,5Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2010)The analysis of the controversial formula of exclusion from the community of believers that we find in 1 Cor 5,5 leads above all to the conclusion that this recommendation can be treated as a rule of how a community should act in these kind of situation. Paul alludes to the real case of an incestuous relation of a member of the Church in Corinth. This behavior is judged as being harmful not only to those who are engaged in it but bas a social dimension as wen and injures the whole community of believers that is no longer credible. Consequently, the community that is not credible is not able to give witness to Jesus Christ. The rhetorical perspective prompts us to broaden this single recommendation on all the cases of overt evil in the community. The status of the act is evident. What Paul is trying to correct is the luck of any reaction of the community on the evil that spreads in it. The Apostle recommends the community to formally exclude the guilty person. It is to be seen as a firm objection against evil and it is motivated by the care for the spiritual well being of both parts. The community should hope that the sinner change his attitude and thus will obtain salvation when the day of the Lord comes.Pozycja Żona zbawiająca męża (1 Kor 7,16)?Muszytowska, Dorota (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2011)The question "How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband?" (1 Cor 7:16) closes the so called ‘Paul's marriage privileges’ running in the preceding verses of 1 Cor 7. The issue expressed with a question mark refers to mixed marriages. The present essay aims to explore this already much harvested text from a new exegetical perspective. In the first part, the socio-religious context of the audience in the 1 Corinthians is exposed: the background of their beliefs and dilemmas concerning marriage. In the second part, the issues of the married women position in Judaism and in the Greco-Roman culture of the period are explored. The last step of the investigation is the analysis (mainly rhetorical) of Paul's argumentation in 1 Cor 7:16 in the context of 1 Cor 7:12-16. The final conclusion is that a Christian wife (as well as a Christian husband) cannot save her spouse because, according to Paul's argumentation in the passage, the responsibility for believers' salvation belongs solely to Christ. Nevertheless, a Christian wife can sanctify her husband.