The Biblical Annals, 2018, T. 8, nr 3
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/23261
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj The Biblical Annals, 2018, T. 8, nr 3 wg Temat "biblistyka"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 11 z 11
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Guarigione di un cieco (Mc 8,22-26) nel contesto del Vangelo di MarcoBąk, Tomasz Bartłomiej (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)The Gospel according to Mark strives after providing the answer to two fundamental questions who Jesus is and who his disciple should be. Thus, the Evangelist makes some attempts to depict the identity of Jesus emphasizing his being the Son of God (cfr. Mk 1:1; 15:39). What is more, setting the description of the road leading to Jerusalem in the centre of his literary work, the author of the gospel highlights the identity of the Jesus’ disciple, who is not always able to understand the one, who called him. The aim of this article is to present the way how the pericope about the cure of a blind man (Mk 8:22-26) is depicted in the dynamism of the whole gospel and how it corresponds with effort being made with the aim of answering the questions: who Jesus is and who his disciples should be. The text, which is written in accordance with the principles of synchronic analysis, is comprised of such sections: I Introductory issues (distinguishing of the pericope as the whole; textual criticism; defining of the internal structure; synoptic comparison); II. Exegetical analysis; III. The significance of the pericope in the context of the whole Gospel; In the analysis of the cure of a blind man (Mk 8:22-26) the disciples are presented as those who seem to remain “outside” Christ mystery. The pericope corresponds perfectly with the fact that they possess eyes that do not see (cfr. Mk 8:18) and they do not yet understand (cfr. Mk 8:21). Not only does Jesus open the eyes of the blind man but also wants to open the eyes of his disciples. Two stages of healing reveal that regaining sight fully is preceded by the period of “shortsightedness” when the disciple has a vision but still blurred. He follows Jesus to Jerusalem, though, he does not understand who Jesus is. The moment when he completely opens his eyes and understands becomes possible in the context of the Paschal Mystery.Pozycja Interpretacja pokutna Janowego opisu obmycia stóp uczniom przez Jezusa. Część 1: Interpretacje sakramentalne na tle współczesnych wyjaśnień J 13,1-20Kubiś, Adam (1976- ) (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)The article deals with the Johannine narrative on the foot-washing, giving a critical review of the current scholarship on the interpretation of Jesus’ gesture (Part 1) and adding a new argument in favor of a penitential reading of the pericope (Part 2). The first part of the study presents status quaestionis, summarizing various interpretations, distilled into three categories: (1) naturalistic or socio-cultural, (2) symbolic, and (3) sacramental. This initial survey starts with a review of all possible ancient cultural contexts, both pagan and Jewish, in which foot-washing occurred, followed by various possible readings of the pericope based on these backgrounds; our analysis suggests that the purely naturalistic explanations do not resolve satisfactorily all the complexities of the text. Next, at least fifteen arguments are enumerated in favor of a symbolic interpretation, with a short survey of noteworthy examples of this approach. Then, various sacramental readings are presented, with a special focus on the baptismal explanation, which indeed has held the most prominent position among the sacramental interpretations within the historical exegesis of the text.Pozycja James W. Barker, John’s Use of Matthew (Emerging Scholars; Fortress: Minneapolis 2015). Pp. XIX + 150. $59.00. ISBN 978-1-4514-9027-5Adamczewski, Bartosz (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Ks. Antoni Paciorek, Drugi List do Koryntian. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz (Nowy Komentarz Biblijny. Nowy Testament VIII; Częstochowa: Edycja Świętego Pawła 2017). 624 s. PLN 74.95 . ISBN 978-83-779-78-054Szmajdziński, Mariusz (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Ks. Tomasz Siemieniec, Teologiczna rola „ludzi” (hoi anthrōpoi) w Apokalipsie Janowej (Kielce: Wydawnictwo Jedność 2018). 682 s. (opr. m.). ISBN 978-83-7971-928-0Wróbel, Mirosław S. (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Ks. Tomasz Zaklukiewicz, Nieśmiertelność sprawiedliwych. Idea nieśmiertelności sprawiedliwych w Księdze Mądrości (Bibliotheca Biblica; Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wrocławskiej Księgarni Archidiecezjalnej „Tum” 2017). 320 s. PLN 59.90 (opr. tw.). ISBN 978-83-7454-400-9Zieliński, Marcin (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Marcin Majewski, Pięcioksiąg odczytany na nowo. Przesłanie autora kapłańskiego (P) i jego wpływ na powstanie Pięcioksięgu (Kraków: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe 2018). 393 s. PLN 99.00. ISBN 978-83-7438-651-7 (druk); 978-83-7438-652-4 (online)Pilarczyk, Krzysztof (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Michael Timothy Law, When God Spoke Greek. The Septuagint and the Making of the Christian Bible (Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press 2013). 216 s. £20.99. ISBN 978-0-19-978172-0Rambiert-Kwaśniewska, Anna (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Pozycja Sandwich Technique in the Gospel of MarkMoj, Marcin (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Intercalations are found in the Gospel of Mark. They are graphically described by the following scheme: A – B – A’. Mark’s convention consists of the break off narration (pericope A) through insertion of another one (B) and placing it inside. Such a technique is called intercalation, interpolation or a sandwich technique. The use of intercalation is somehow intended. The purpose of this article is to indicate a problem of criteria that will allow to select the texts of intercalations precisely. The analysis of the criteria and the features of intercalations corroborates the use of sandwich technique by Mark in the six commonly accepted by the biblical scholars conjoined narratives: 3:20-35; 5:21-43; 6:6b-31; 11:12-25; 14:1-11; 14:53-72 and also in case of the juxtaposed pericopes from the group of disputable ones: 8:1-21 and 15:40–16:8.Pozycja Stoicka pneuma a Pawłowa koncepcja Ducha w Rz 8. Cz.1: Argumentacja Rz 8 i przegląd badań nad stoicką pneumą u PawłaKowalski, Marcin (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)In the article the author poses a question on the nature and character of the Spirit’s acting and indwelling in believers in Romans 8. To what extent can the Pauline concept of Spirit be associated with the stoic idea of pneuma which also dwells within humans, grants them knowledge and life? In order to answer this question, in the first part of the paper the author analyzes the semantic fields of Rom 5–8 and their convergence in Rom 8, with a special focus on the vocabulary of new life mediated by the Spirit. Subsequently, the rhetorical structure of Rom 8 is elucidated. At the end, the author presents a concise survey of the research on the interaction between the Pauline and the stoic idea of pneuma. The critical evaluation of the various scholarly works on the issue and the rhetorical dispositio of Rom 8 constitute a point of departure for a closer analysis of similarities and differences between Paul and the stoic pneumatology, which will be carried on in part two of the article.Pozycja What Do Byssus and Crimson Imply about the Hebrew Bible and the Septuagint?Rambiert-Kwaśniewska, Anna (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2018)Fabrics such as byssus and crimson wool can provide us with a surprisingly large amount of information about the circumstances of Biblical books origin. Analysis of lexis related to mentioned textiles, present in Exodus and in Chronicles, allows to notice a meaningful change, occurring in technical biblical terminology. In Exodus, byssus is represented by שֵׁשׁ and crimson – byתֹולַעַת ׁשָנִי, whilst in Chronicles naming is changed respectively to בּוץ and כּרמיל. Analysis of etymology leads to the conclusion, that textiles mentioned in Torah belong to an early vocabulary, created in the times before the exile, in Chronicles, on the other hand, encountered terms belong to period of Babylonian captivity or after the exile. Confrontation of these textiles with the other, non-biblical sources, provides a confirmation of proposed dating and facilitates identification of mysterious biblical byssus, which turns out to be a very thin linen and not – as sometimes confused – sea silk. Juxtaposition of the Greek equivalents allows to draw a conclusion, that terminology of both Torah and Chronicles was known to the LXX translators, who – despite a clear caesura – translate terms consequently: שֵׁשׁ and ּבּוץ to βύσσινος/βύσσος, and תֹולַעַת ׁשָנִי and כַרְ מִיל to κόκκινος.