Roczniki Teologiczne, 2000, T. 47, z. 1

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/8776

Przeglądaj

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 6 z 6

Bóg jako Ojciec Jezusa (J 10, 22-42)
Witczyk, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)
The most essential truth about Jesus Christ revealed in the fourth Gospel is about the bond between Him and God the Father. How should we understand the fatherhood of God in relation to Jesus? St. John describes it most clearly in three formulations (10, 30, 36, 38f). The first of them („The Father and I are one”, 1. 30) points to the unity of action. Jesus’ action contains the action of God the Father; it concerns people, especially the believers. At the same time it is unity in their victory over evil. Owing to “being one” with the Father, Jesus participates in the “Glory” and in the “Name” of God. The second formulation (“the Father is in me and I am in the Father” - 1. 38) expresses the idea of mutual, permanent, complete and eschatological presence: Jesus is in the Father and the Father in Jesus. Simultaneously the formulation unveils the relationship of love (the mutual devotion: The Father to Jesus and Jesus to the Father), and the relationship of dynamic cognition. Eventually, the third sentence is saying about "the one whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world” (1. 36) reveals the truth about Jesus as a new Temple, the sphere of God's constant presence among the People of the Covenant. Jesus Christ brings into the world Presence which is in Him, which is the source of the salvation of the world.
Kolejność, liczba i kształt „biada” w Q: próba rekonstrukcji na bazie Mt 23 i Łk 11
Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)
The author seeks to determine the sequence, number and shape of particular "woes” in the source Q. The reconstruction of the sequence of the number of "woes” in Q allows us to a greater or lesser extent come closer to tradition at the basis of Mt and Lk. The sequence of "woes” in Mt is closer to Q. To determine the shape (even approximate) of individual "woes” remains highly hypothetical (that is why Mt and Lk could use various version of a common tradition). The editorial trends of Mt and Lk suggest only greater or lesser relationship with Q.
Sensy biblijne. Podział, charakterystyka, kontrowersje
Szymik, Stefan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)
Thomas Söding, Wege der Schriftauslegung. Methodenbuch zum Neuen Testament. Unter Mitarbeit von Cristian Münch, Freiburg-Basel-Wien: Herder 1998, ss. 350.
Szymik, Stefan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)
„Ukryję przed nimi swe oblicze”. Sens perykopy Pwt 32, 19-21
Szwarc, Urszula (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)
An analysis of the lines from Dt 32, 19:21 points that the "hiding” of Yahweh’s face from Israel seems to be identical with the future taking over the place and role of the people of God from the Old Testament by an unknown community. This decision made by the Lord of history does not bear the character of His requital. Its purpose is to make Israel repent.
Zbawienie w ujęciu Ap 7, 9-17
Kiejza, Andrzej (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Roczniki Teologiczne, 2000, T. 47, z. 1 wg Temat "biblical exegesis"