Roczniki Teologiczne, 2000, T. 47, z. 1
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/8776
Przeglądaj
Ostatnie zgłoszenia
Pozycja Ostatnie dziesięciolecia Królestwa JudzkiegoBrzegowy, Tadeusz (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Zbawienie w ujęciu Ap 7, 9-17Kiejza, Andrzej (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Hugolin Langkammer OFM, Pneumatologia biblijna (ruach - pneuma), Opole: Opolska Biblioteka Teologiczna 1998, ss. 174.Kudasiewicz, Józef (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Jeszcze o autorstwie IV EwangeliiPaciorek, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Basing himself, implicitly or explicitly, on the findings of diachronic and synchronic studies on the author of the Fourth Gospel, the author presents his own opinion about the authorship of this Gospel. He believes that it is John, the son of Zebedee, on of the Twelve Apostles. The work of John the Apostle is continued by John's collaborator, one of the most prominent personalities of John's community, namely John the Presbyter. It is in his surrounding, in Ephesus, that the proper edition of the Fourth Gospel was completed. And it is there that John the Apostle, the father of church community, which came from Syria to Asia Minor, was called “the disciple whom Jesus loved” The last editor, after the death of John the Presbyter, in face of the dangers threatening the Church in Asia, intended to bind it closely with the authority of the "beloved disciple”, that is John son of Zebedee. He did it through his final remarks on the writing of the Gospel. From that time, that is from the time of the last edition the belief that John the Apostle was its author has paved its victorious way through ages. At the time the main editor of the Fourth Gospel, i.e. John the Presbyter, has fallen into oblivion.Pozycja Bóg naszym Ojcem w świetle Ewangelii św. MateuszaLangkammer, Hugolin (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Kolejność, liczba i kształt „biada” w Q: próba rekonstrukcji na bazie Mt 23 i Łk 11Rakocy, Waldemar (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)The author seeks to determine the sequence, number and shape of particular "woes” in the source Q. The reconstruction of the sequence of the number of "woes” in Q allows us to a greater or lesser extent come closer to tradition at the basis of Mt and Lk. The sequence of "woes” in Mt is closer to Q. To determine the shape (even approximate) of individual "woes” remains highly hypothetical (that is why Mt and Lk could use various version of a common tradition). The editorial trends of Mt and Lk suggest only greater or lesser relationship with Q.Pozycja Sensy biblijne. Podział, charakterystyka, kontrowersjeSzymik, Stefan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Qumrańskie rękopisy Księgi Tobiasza (4Q 196-4Q 200)Tronina, Antoni (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)The paper presents a Polish translation of those manuscripts with a commentary. The latter leads to the following five conclusions: 1. The original language of Tb is most probable Aramaic. 2. The Hebrew text (4Q 200) is based on Aramaic but does not accurately agree with any of the preserved copies (4Q 196-199). 3. The longer revision of the Greek text is based on the Semitic text, but is different from all the known texts from Qumran. 4. In the light of the manuscripts of Tb from Qumran, who are free from any specific vocabulary of the sect, the Book may be dated back to circa 300 before Christ. 5. The concentric structure of Tb, clear in the longer Greek review, is confirmed already by the division into the pericopes of manuscripts 4Q 196-200.Pozycja „Ukryję przed nimi swe oblicze”. Sens perykopy Pwt 32, 19-21Szwarc, Urszula (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)An analysis of the lines from Dt 32, 19:21 points that the "hiding” of Yahweh’s face from Israel seems to be identical with the future taking over the place and role of the people of God from the Old Testament by an unknown community. This decision made by the Lord of history does not bear the character of His requital. Its purpose is to make Israel repent.Pozycja Osobowe doświadczenie Boga Ojca u proroków Amosa, Ozeasza, Jeremiasza i DeuteroizajaszaWitaszek, Gabriel (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Bóg jako Ojciec Jezusa (J 10, 22-42)Witczyk, Henryk (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)The most essential truth about Jesus Christ revealed in the fourth Gospel is about the bond between Him and God the Father. How should we understand the fatherhood of God in relation to Jesus? St. John describes it most clearly in three formulations (10, 30, 36, 38f). The first of them („The Father and I are one”, 1. 30) points to the unity of action. Jesus’ action contains the action of God the Father; it concerns people, especially the believers. At the same time it is unity in their victory over evil. Owing to “being one” with the Father, Jesus participates in the “Glory” and in the “Name” of God. The second formulation (“the Father is in me and I am in the Father” - 1. 38) expresses the idea of mutual, permanent, complete and eschatological presence: Jesus is in the Father and the Father in Jesus. Simultaneously the formulation unveils the relationship of love (the mutual devotion: The Father to Jesus and Jesus to the Father), and the relationship of dynamic cognition. Eventually, the third sentence is saying about "the one whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world” (1. 36) reveals the truth about Jesus as a new Temple, the sphere of God's constant presence among the People of the Covenant. Jesus Christ brings into the world Presence which is in Him, which is the source of the salvation of the world.Pozycja Polska bibliografia biblijna za lata 1997-1998Szier-Kramarek, Barbara (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Thomas Söding, Wege der Schriftauslegung. Methodenbuch zum Neuen Testament. Unter Mitarbeit von Cristian Münch, Freiburg-Basel-Wien: Herder 1998, ss. 350.Szymik, Stefan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)Pozycja Kronika Instytutu Nauk Biblijnych KUL za rok akademicki 1998/99Szymik, Stefan (Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2000)