Scriptura Sacra, 2021, R. 25
Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/26228
Przeglądaj
Przeglądaj Scriptura Sacra, 2021, R. 25 wg Temat "analiza egzegetyczna"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Das Problem der Gerechtigkeit bei Protojesaja. Eine kognitiv-exegetische Analyse. Zweiter TeilDziony, Marek (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego UO, 2021)This article is in the context of cognitive-exegetic research on the text of Scripture. On the one hand, it hooks into the area of linguistics, but takes a step further, towards the exegesis of the prophetic text, in this case the Proto-Isaiah text. The aim of such an approach is to try to assess the usefulness of the method of cognitive linguistics for the analysis and interpretation of the biblical text, and to determine how innovative the results of this type of analysis are, and to what extent it confirms the achievements to date. The research uses the method of conceptual metaphor in the definition given by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. As a cognitive method, it gives the possibility of a synchronous study of the text, allowing us to penetrate the thinking of the people of the time when the work was created. As a result of the analysis of the text, this method gives a comprehensive picture of the issues of justice that emerges from the text of the book Proto-Isaiah. The research has shown that this method is most suitable for the exegesis of the sacred text, showing a holistic picture of the problem under investigation and its evolution. However, it should be stipulated that only a selected aspect can be studied with this method, and that studying multiple threads simultaneously can lead to chaos and a lack of concrete results. Although the method itself rather confirms the analyses made so far, its innovation is attested to by the fact that it gives a holistic view of the phenomenon under investigation.Pozycja Motyw ustanowienia Eucharystii. Analiza egzegetyczna perykopy Mt 26,26-30Ludwig, Michał (Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego UO, 2021)The research carried out is part of a study of the Gospel according to St Matthew, and the motif of the institution of the Eucharist shown in the Bible in four different places (Mt 26:26-30; Mk 14:22-25; Lk 22:14-20 and 1 Cor 11:23-26). The aim of the study was to analyse the text describing the moment of the institution of the Eucharist (Mt 26:26-30). An attempt was made to discover the most important message coming from the given biblical pericope. Three methods were used in the research process (historical-critical analysis, linguistic analysis and intertextual analysis), the application of which influenced the delimitation of the individual points of the work. The results achieved can be put in a few sentences corresponding to the methods used. Namely, described fragment Mt 26:26-30 is the last part of Matthew’s relation about the Last Supper of Jesus with His disciples. The author in editing this passus used Mark’s (Mk 14:22-25) and Luke’s (Lk 22:14-20) accounts, as well as his own material. Next, it should be stated that in Matthew’s description of the institution of the Eucharist, Jesus and His work comes to the foreground, even though during the described supper probably took place also other activities. The author wanted to emphasize the im portance of Jesus’ actions and words ln tbis way. On the other hand, taking into account the theological message of the pericope of Mt 26:26-30, it should be stated that the notions of covenant (Jesus concludes a new and eternal covenant during the East Supper), blood (Christ, giving the disciples to drink his blood, gives them at the same time a share in his divine life) and body (by receiving the body of Jesus during the Last Supper, the disciples thus unite with his whole person) are of fundamental importance in it. From the research carried out we also draw conclusions for further analysis of the text of the institution of the Eucharist in St Matthew. Namely, the analysis of the fragment of Mt 26:26-30 only by the synchronic method, which is the linguistic analysis, is insufficient and requires supplementing with, at least, intenextual analysis. This is how it turned out that the pericope Mt 26:26-30 is very rich in theological content, the explanation of which must be sought in many other biblical books. There were also questions of debate, such as the question of the ipsissima verba Jesu in the pericope, given that there are four versions of the text on the institution of the Eucharist. Looking ahead, one could also consider making a theological-biblical synthesis on the Eucharist on the basis of all four texts of Sacred Scripture treating its institution.