Teologia w Polsce, 2018, Tom 12, Nr 2

Stały URI dla kolekcjihttps://theo-logos.pl/handle/123456789/36536

Przeglądaj

Przeglądaj Teologia w Polsce, 2018, Tom 12, Nr 2 wg Temat "Bible"

Wpisz kilka pierwszych liter i kliknij przycisk przeglądania
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 6 z 6
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Das Gebet Jesu in der Lehre vom Papst Benedikt XVI
    Sosnowski, Aleksander (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2018)
    The reflection of Benedict XVI about Jesus’ prayer constitutes a significant element of the Pope’s teachings. All four Evangelists, especially Saint Luke, give us a testimony of Jesus’ prayer. It is undoubtedly one of the most important characteristics of Jesus in the New Testament: it characterizes Jesus from his childhood up until his last words on the cross. Analyzing the Bible’s testimony Benedict XVI underlines that Jesus’ prayer, and his dialogue with his Father constitute the essence of him himself and his mission. The most important works of Jesus originate from it, and Jesus’ prayer in the garden of Gethsemane and “yes” said to the Father precede His passion, death and resurrection. Prayer is a privileged place for Christology, in it and thanks to it, we can recognize Jesus as the true Messiah, the Son of God as the disciples did. Therefore, prayer is undoubtedly the key to Christology of Joseph Ratzinger, Benedict XVI and the key to Christology in general.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Jaką rolę odgrywa egzegeza w dogmatyce?
    Körner, Bernhard (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2018)
    With the end of neoscholastic theology, there was a necessity of new definition of relation between dogmatics, which is now understood from the perspective of history of salvation, and exegesis which, among other methods, uses a historicocritical method. Fundamentals of that new understanding have been given by the constitution Dei Verbum of Vaticanum II. Reffering to this document, the article presents the thesis that the interpretation of the Holy Scripture by the Church through the ages, that is in the living Tradition, and historicocritical interpretation are two different approaches which, nevertheless, should not be contradicted. What is more, we can read the Bible and understand it not just as a historical text but as the Word of God for today, only when we take into account the mutual influence of these two approaches.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Pismo Święte czytane przez ojców
    Kasprzak, Dariusz (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2018)
    The unification of the books of the Bible and the definition of the standard Constantine edition of the Holy Scripture set about 425 was historically coincident with the imperial policy of the introducing of religious homogeneity in the Roman Empire at the beginning of the fourth century. Moreover, due to the cultural continuity within the Roman Empire until the 5th century, it was possible the translation of “word for word”. The German-Iranian raids in the 5th century resulted in the disintegration of the ancient cultural community, and caused the necessity of the translations of “meaning in meaning”. The highest form of God’s revelation for the patristic authors was the incarnation of God. The Bible, as the revealed word of God, was understood as a privileged, free God’s phenomenon, through which God reveals the truth about himself and communicates with man. Consequently the Church Fathers interpreted the divine inspiration as the gift of God which was given to a biblical author. In this way an inspired writer was able to convey the divine revelation drown from the Holy Scriptures to a community of the faithful, which received as the word of God himself. In the opinion of the Church Fathers, the Christian theology was based on the contemplation of the Bible, which constituted the norm of the Christian faith. To the Patristic writers Jesus was a hermeneutic key to the Holy Scripture and it was him who leads the faithful to the cognition of the divine mystery and the human dignity. In their exegesis and theology the Christian Fathers showed us that the Person of Jesus, who ultimately revealed the Father to us should not be distinguished from testimony of the Christian kerygma and the Holy Scriptures. This affirmative attitude towards the Bible contributed to the formation of the biblical canon in the 7th century and also shaped the Trinitarian, spiritual and liturgical tradition of the Church. The Biblical interpretation of the church Fathers can be regarded as a more complete meaning of the NT, which expresses the sense intended by God, the first author of the Scripture in the dogmatic tradition of the Church, and which sense was not fully known to the human author of the Scriptures (e.g. the concept of the Holy Trinity, the intra-trinitarian relations and the doctrine of the original sin). Thus understood the reading of Scripture was for the patristic writers both the source of their faith and their theology.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    “Spirit and Power”: Modernity on Miracles, Biblical Studies, and the Leap of Faith
    Giambrone, Anthony (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2018)
    Nowoczesny sposób interpretacji Pisma Świętego, w tym zwłaszcza egzegeza historyczno-krytyczna, w wielu punktach musi zderzyć się z podejściem kościelno-dogmatycznym. Kwestią, która rodzi w tym spotkaniu szczególnie dużo wątpliwości, jest historyczność Jezusa, a zwłaszcza czynionych przez Niego cudów. Dla nowoczesnej mentalności cuda są czymś skrajnie obcym, toteż od kilkuset lat pojawiają się próby takiej interpretacji przekazu Ewangelii, która wykluczyłaby literalne przyjmowanie opisów wydarzeń cudownych. Również i dziś w egzegezie toczy się pewien spór pomiędzy tymi, którzy mocno tkwią w nowoczesnym, racjonalistycznym paradygmacie, a tymi, którzy starają się być zakorzenieni nade wszystko w tradycyjnej teologii. Niniejszy artykuł dowodzi, że współczesna egzegeza z konieczności prowadzi do decyzji wiary. Tylko owa wiara może opowiedzieć się za prawdą Ewangelii, niezależnie od kwestii historycznego charakteru opisów cudów w tekstach biblijnych. Ostatecznie sprawa Jezusa i Jego cudów jest sprawą wiary, a nie samych badań historycznych.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Tradycja jako zasada katolickiej teologii
    Müller, Gerhard Ludwig (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2018)
    The biblical revelation, as well as all Christianity, has strictly historical character. Therefore, theology should remain historical as well. Apart from the fact that it teaches some timeless truths, theology, on the first place, proclaims the message about God reveling himself in the history. This message itself is historical and it is communicated from generation to generation in dynamic process called Tradition. Therefore, Tradition is not an external norm but it is rather a fundamental rule for every theologian – the rule without which we cannot speak of Catholic theology at all. This role of Tradition should be emphasized especially nowadays when we experience a “cult of contemporaneity” and when we see a trend in the Church to treat unofficial sayings of Pope and other members of the hierarchy as normative and supposedly standing above Tradition.